GSEE vs. ROAM
GSEE (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and ROAM (Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - GSEE tracks the Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while ROAM tracks the Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSEE returned 6.60%/yr vs 11.34%/yr for ROAM. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSEE charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for ROAM.
Performance
GSEE vs. ROAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSEE achieves a 17.53% return, which is significantly lower than ROAM's 19.49% return.
GSEE
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- YTD
- 17.53%
- 1Y
- 32.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- —
ROAM
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -5.64%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- YTD
- 19.49%
- 1Y
- 34.03%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
GSEE vs. ROAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 17.53% | 33.38% | 4.94% | 11.03% | -19.57% | -2.61% | 43.54% |
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 19.49% | 32.08% | 6.21% | 21.28% | -14.78% | 9.32% | 32.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEE and ROAM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between GSEE and ROAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSEE vs. ROAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSEE
ROAM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
GSEE
ROAM
Financial Services
GSEE
ROAM
Consumer Cyclical
GSEE
ROAM
Industrials
GSEE
ROAM
Communication Services
GSEE
ROAM
Basic Materials
GSEE
ROAM
Energy
GSEE
ROAM
Healthcare
GSEE
ROAM
Consumer Defensive
GSEE
ROAM
Utilities
GSEE
ROAM
Real Estate
GSEE
ROAM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSEE vs. ROAM — Risk / Return Rank
GSEE
ROAM
GSEE vs. ROAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSEE | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.37 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 3.45 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | 10.95 | -2.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSEE vs. ROAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEE drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, smaller than the maximum ROAM drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEE and ROAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEE | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.51% | -45.47% | +7.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | -9.92% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.39% | -16.79% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.36% | -27.07% | -5.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.79% | -7.49% | -2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.55% | -11.06% | -3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 3.11% | +0.86% |
Volatility
GSEE vs. ROAM - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) has a higher volatility of 9.87% compared to Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) at 6.31%. This indicates that GSEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSEE | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.87% | 6.31% | +3.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.95% | 15.46% | +5.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.10% | 17.09% | +6.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 15.69% | +3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 17.90% | +1.05% |
GSEE vs. ROAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than ROAM's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSEE vs. ROAM - Dividend Comparison
GSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than ROAM's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.15% | 2.53% | 2.79% | 3.07% | 3.05% | 6.10% | 2.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 2.45% | 3.17% | 4.15% | 5.40% | 5.23% | 4.22% | 3.04% | 3.55% | 2.54% | 1.84% | 1.89% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSEE and ROAM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSEE has higher volatility (9.87%) compared to ROAM (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEE dropped -37.51% vs ROAM's -45.47%.
On 5-year performance, ROAM leads with 11.34% vs 6.60% for GSEE. On fees, GSEE is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, ROAM has been the lower-risk option at 6.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ROAM has performed better with a 11.34% return vs 6.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSEE is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for ROAM.
ROAM has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 2.15% for GSEE.
GSEE tracks Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while ROAM tracks Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for GSEE and 0.44% for ROAM.
ROAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSEE and ROAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer