GSEE vs. GPIQ
GSEE (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSEE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. GSEE is passively managed, while GPIQ is actively managed. Over the past year, GSEE returned 54.30% vs 37.50% for GPIQ. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSEE charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.
Performance
GSEE vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSEE achieves a 27.44% return, which is significantly higher than GPIQ's 18.30% return.
GSEE
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 27.44%
- 6M
- 30.18%
- 1Y
- 54.30%
- 3Y*
- 23.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- —
GPIQ
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 8.51%
- YTD
- 18.30%
- 6M
- 17.64%
- 1Y
- 37.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSEE vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 27.44% | 33.38% | 4.94% | 12.44% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 18.30% | 19.77% | 23.22% | 15.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEE and GPIQ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023 | 0.64 |
The correlation between GSEE and GPIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSEE vs. GPIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSEE
GPIQ
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
GSEE
GPIQ
Financial Services
GSEE
GPIQ
Consumer Cyclical
GSEE
GPIQ
Industrials
GSEE
GPIQ
Communication Services
GSEE
GPIQ
Basic Materials
GSEE
GPIQ
Energy
GSEE
GPIQ
Healthcare
GSEE
GPIQ
Consumer Defensive
GSEE
GPIQ
Utilities
GSEE
GPIQ
Real Estate
GSEE
GPIQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSEE vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
GSEE
GPIQ
GSEE vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSEE | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.51 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 3.96 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.02 | 17.48 | -1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSEE | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.81 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 1.78 | -1.01 |
Drawdowns
GSEE vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEE drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEE and GPIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEE | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.51% | -21.06% | -16.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | -9.51% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -0.19% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.73% | -2.27% | -12.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 2.15% | +1.25% |
Volatility
GSEE vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) at 3.39%. This indicates that GSEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSEE | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.68% | 3.39% | +5.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.80% | 10.44% | +6.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 13.40% | +6.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 17.47% | +0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 17.47% | +0.92% |
GSEE vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSEE vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
GSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than GPIQ's 9.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 9.32% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.98% | 2.53% | 2.79% | 3.07% | 3.05% | 6.10% | 2.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSEE and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSEE has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to GPIQ (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEE dropped -37.51% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.
On 1-year performance, GSEE leads with 54.30% vs 37.50% for GPIQ. On fees, GPIQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GSEE has performed better with a 54.30% return vs 37.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPIQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for GSEE.
GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 1.98% for GSEE.
GSEE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for GSEE and 0.29% for GPIQ.
GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSEE and GPIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer