PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEE vs. EDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEE vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEE achieves a 18.29% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 8.78% return.


GSEE

1D
-3.50%
1M
-4.03%
6M
11.63%
YTD
18.29%
1Y
35.14%
3Y*
18.81%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*

EDIV

1D
-0.52%
1M
0.94%
6M
6.78%
YTD
8.78%
1Y
13.22%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEE vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSEE
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
18.29%33.38%4.94%11.03%-19.57%-2.61%43.54%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
8.78%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%21.23%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEE and EDIV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020

0.78

The correlation between GSEE and EDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSEE vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEE
EDIV

Technology

43.0%
7.6%

Financial Services

17.1%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
7.8%

Industrials

8.0%
6.2%

Communication Services

5.8%
5.2%

Basic Materials

5.6%
0.9%

Energy

3.4%
3.9%

Healthcare

2.8%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
9.4%

Utilities

2.1%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.9%

Technology

GSEE
43.0%
EDIV
7.6%

Financial Services

GSEE
17.1%
EDIV
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEE
8.7%
EDIV
7.8%

Industrials

GSEE
8.0%
EDIV
6.2%

Communication Services

GSEE
5.8%
EDIV
5.2%

Basic Materials

GSEE
5.6%
EDIV
0.9%

Energy

GSEE
3.4%
EDIV
3.9%

Healthcare

GSEE
2.8%
EDIV
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

GSEE
2.5%
EDIV
9.4%

Utilities

GSEE
2.1%
EDIV
1.7%

Real Estate

GSEE
1.1%
EDIV
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEE vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEE
GSEE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GSEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEE vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSEEEDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.19

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

1.28

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

3.74

+5.40

GSEE vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEE Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEE and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSEE vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEE drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEE and EDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEEEDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.51%

-53.36%

+15.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.05%

-10.36%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.39%

-13.84%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.96%

-28.32%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.20%

-1.94%

-7.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.56%

-19.25%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

3.54%

+0.32%

Volatility

GSEE vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 4.62%. This indicates that GSEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEEEDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.10%

4.62%

+6.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.86%

11.03%

+9.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.01%

12.79%

+10.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.03%

13.94%

+5.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.94%

17.31%

+1.63%

GSEE vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSEE vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

GSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than EDIV's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.17%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
GSEE
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.14%2.53%2.79%3.07%3.05%6.10%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSEE and EDIV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSEE has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to EDIV (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEE dropped -37.51% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

On 5-year performance, EDIV leads with 11.94% vs 6.59% for GSEE. On fees, GSEE is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 11.94% return vs 6.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEE is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 2.14% for GSEE.

GSEE tracks Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for GSEE and 0.49% for EDIV.

GSEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEE and EDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer