GSBFX vs. GSCMX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GSBFX (Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund) and GSCMX (Goldman Sachs Income Fund) are both mutual funds - GSBFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GSCMX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 5 years, GSBFX returned 5.44%/yr vs 2.95%/yr for GSCMX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSBFX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for GSCMX.

Performance

GSBFX vs. GSCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) and Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSBFX achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly higher than GSCMX's 0.57% return.

GSBFX

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 1.25%
• YTD: 4.84%
• 6M: 5.08%
• 1Y: 13.13%
• 3Y*: 10.80%
• 5Y*: 5.44%
• 10Y*: 6.98%

GSCMX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 0.57%
• 6M: 1.08%
• 1Y: 5.65%
• 3Y*: 7.73%
• 5Y*: 2.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSBFX vs. GSCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GSBFX Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund	4.84%	10.42%	9.32%	9.64%	-9.53%	10.50%	9.53%	2.00%
GSCMX Goldman Sachs Income Fund	0.57%	8.70%	6.13%	10.60%	-10.75%	0.42%	9.24%	1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between GSBFX and GSCMX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019	0.60

The correlation between GSBFX and GSCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GSBFX vs. GSCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSBFX

GSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 68
GSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
GSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
GSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
GSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
GSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

GSCMX

GSCMX Risk / Return Rank: 46
GSCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
GSCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
GSCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
GSCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
GSCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSBFX vs. GSCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) and Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSBFX	GSCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	1.91	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	2.99	+0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.39	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	2.07	+0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.13	9.61	+3.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSBFX vs. GSCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the GSCMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSBFX and GSCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSBFX	GSCMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	1.91	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.68	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.65	+0.05

Drawdowns

GSBFX vs. GSCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSBFX drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than GSCMX's maximum drawdown of -20.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSBFX and GSCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSBFX	GSCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.04%	-20.12%	-16.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.44%	-2.93%	-1.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.14%	-3.24%	-4.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.94%	-18.20%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.28%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.18%	-3.82%	-0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	0.63%	+0.39%

Volatility

GSBFX vs. GSCMX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) at 1.09%. This indicates that GSBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSBFX	GSCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.71%	1.09%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.46%	2.57%	+1.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.50%	3.17%	+2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.41%	4.37%	+3.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.99%	5.79%	+2.20%

GSBFX vs. GSCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSBFX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GSCMX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSBFX vs. GSCMX - Dividend Comparison

GSBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, which matches GSCMX's 5.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSBFX Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund	5.11%	4.39%	5.12%	3.41%	4.10%	6.66%	3.05%	3.52%	3.98%	3.52%	3.78%	3.93%
GSCMX Goldman Sachs Income Fund	5.09%	5.09%	5.39%	4.71%	8.43%	3.51%	3.95%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSBFX and GSCMX in my portfolio?

GSBFX and GSCMX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSBFX or GSCMX?

GSBFX has higher volatility (1.71%) compared to GSCMX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSBFX dropped -37.04% vs GSCMX's -20.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.