PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSCMX vs. BWDTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSCMX vs. BWDTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) and Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund (BWDTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSCMX achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than BWDTX's 1.78% return.


GSCMX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.82%
YTD
0.69%
6M
1.17%
1Y
5.53%
3Y*
7.60%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*

BWDTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.50%
YTD
1.78%
6M
2.09%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
6.50%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSCMX vs. BWDTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GSCMX
Goldman Sachs Income Fund
0.69%8.70%6.13%10.60%-10.75%0.42%9.24%1.17%
BWDTX
Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund
1.78%7.14%4.92%9.80%-3.16%2.32%4.66%0.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GSCMX and BWDTX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.73

The correlation between GSCMX and BWDTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSCMX vs. BWDTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSCMX
GSCMX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GSCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GSCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

BWDTX
BWDTX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BWDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BWDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSCMX vs. BWDTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) and Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund (BWDTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSCMXBWDTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

2.34

-0.97

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

5.98

-4.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.99

30.22

-21.23

GSCMX vs. BWDTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSCMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the BWDTX Sharpe Ratio of 4.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSCMX and BWDTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSCMX vs. BWDTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSCMX drawdown since its inception was -20.12%, which is greater than BWDTX's maximum drawdown of -10.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCMX and BWDTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSCMXBWDTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.12%

-10.06%

-10.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-1.00%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.24%

-2.21%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.20%

-6.35%

-11.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.10%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-0.67%

-3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

0.20%

+0.43%

Volatility

GSCMX vs. BWDTX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund (BWDTX) at 0.39%. This indicates that GSCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BWDTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSCMXBWDTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

0.39%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.61%

1.04%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19%

1.30%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.38%

2.21%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.77%

2.20%

+3.57%

GSCMX vs. BWDTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSCMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than BWDTX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSCMX vs. BWDTX - Dividend Comparison

GSCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, less than BWDTX's 5.64% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BWDTX
Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund
5.64%5.70%4.13%5.51%3.80%3.20%3.18%3.47%4.18%2.90%1.35%
GSCMX
Goldman Sachs Income Fund
5.09%5.09%5.39%4.71%8.43%3.51%3.95%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSCMX and BWDTX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSCMX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to BWDTX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSCMX dropped -20.12% vs BWDTX's -10.06%.

BWDTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.57 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSCMX and BWDTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer