GSBFX vs. GPPIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GSBFX (Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund) and GPPIX (Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund) are both mutual funds - GSBFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GPPIX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 10 years, GSBFX returned 6.97%/yr vs 2.55%/yr for GPPIX. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSBFX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for GPPIX.

Performance

GSBFX vs. GPPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) and Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund (GPPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSBFX achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly higher than GPPIX's 1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, GSBFX has outperformed GPPIX with an annualized return of 6.97%, while GPPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.55% annualized return.

GSBFX

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 4.73%
• 6M: 5.31%
• 1Y: 13.36%
• 3Y*: 10.76%
• 5Y*: 5.47%
• 10Y*: 6.97%

GPPIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: 4.43%
• 3Y*: 4.76%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: 2.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSBFX vs. GPPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSBFX Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund	4.73%	10.42%	9.32%	9.64%	-9.53%	10.50%	9.53%	19.38%	-4.92%	7.94%
GPPIX Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund	1.56%	4.83%	5.21%	4.50%	0.73%	-0.00%	1.43%	3.05%	2.16%	1.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GSBFX and GPPIX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.09

The correlation between GSBFX and GPPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GSBFX vs. GPPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSBFX

GSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 70
GSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
GSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
GSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
GSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

GPPIX

GPPIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
GPPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GPPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
GPPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
GPPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
GPPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSBFX vs. GPPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) and Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund (GPPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSBFX	GPPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	3.45	-0.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	11.79	-8.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	4.14	-2.67
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	16.31	-13.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.71	74.40	-60.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSBFX vs. GPPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the GPPIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSBFX and GPPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSBFX	GPPIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	3.45	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	2.66	-1.92
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	2.39	-1.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	2.30	-1.59

Drawdowns

GSBFX vs. GPPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSBFX drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than GPPIX's maximum drawdown of -3.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSBFX and GPPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSBFX	GPPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.04%	-3.08%	-33.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.44%	-0.30%	-4.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.14%	-0.40%	-7.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.94%	-0.77%	-15.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.42%	-3.08%	-20.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	0.00%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.18%	-0.07%	-4.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	0.06%	+0.96%

Volatility

GSBFX vs. GPPIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund (GPPIX) at 0.33%. This indicates that GSBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSBFX	GPPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.71%	0.33%	+1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.44%	0.91%	+3.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.48%	1.30%	+4.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.41%	1.25%	+6.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.99%	1.07%	+6.92%

GSBFX vs. GPPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSBFX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GPPIX's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSBFX vs. GPPIX - Dividend Comparison

GSBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than GPPIX's 4.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GPPIX Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund	4.23%	4.51%	4.77%	3.68%	1.22%	0.30%	1.12%	2.61%	2.24%	1.33%	0.94%	0.49%
GSBFX Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund	5.11%	4.39%	5.12%	3.41%	4.10%	6.66%	3.05%	3.52%	3.98%	3.52%	3.78%	3.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSBFX and GPPIX in my portfolio?

GSBFX and GPPIX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSBFX or GPPIX?

GSBFX has higher volatility (1.71%) compared to GPPIX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSBFX dropped -37.04% vs GPPIX's -3.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.