GPPIX vs. GSIMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GPPIX (Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund) and GSIMX (Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - GPPIX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GSIMX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 5 years, GPPIX returned 3.40%/yr vs 9.21%/yr for GSIMX. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GPPIX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for GSIMX.

Performance

GPPIX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund (GPPIX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPPIX achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than GSIMX's 8.14% return.

GPPIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 1.46%
• YTD: 1.90%
• 1Y: 3.86%
• 3Y*: 4.57%
• 5Y*: 3.40%
• 10Y*: 2.57%
• ALL TIME*: 2.30%

GSIMX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 2.06%
• 6M: 4.43%
• YTD: 8.14%
• 1Y: 15.67%
• 3Y*: 15.47%
• 5Y*: 9.21%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GPPIX Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

GPPIX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GPPIX Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund	1.90%	4.83%	5.21%	4.50%	0.73%	0.00%	1.43%	3.05%	2.16%	1.44%
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	8.14%	20.85%	9.66%	22.10%	-11.06%	12.50%	15.77%	27.64%	-6.04%	29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between GPPIX and GSIMX is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.04

The correlation between GPPIX and GSIMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GPPIX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GPPIX

GPPIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
GPPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
GPPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
GPPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
GPPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
GPPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

GSIMX

GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 61
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GPPIX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund (GPPIX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GPPIX	GSIMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.35	1.60	+1.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	11.00	2.21	+8.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.83	1.30	+2.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.54	2.02	+12.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	64.87	5.51	+59.36

GPPIX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPPIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPPIX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GPPIX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPPIX drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, smaller than the maximum GSIMX drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPPIX and GSIMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPPIX	GSIMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.08%	-28.84%	+25.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.30%	-7.81%	+7.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.40%	-10.32%	+9.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.77%	-25.37%	+24.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-3.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.17%	+2.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.07%	-4.80%	+4.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.07%	2.85%	-2.78%

Volatility

GPPIX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund (GPPIX) is 0.14%, while Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that GPPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPPIX	GSIMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.14%	2.73%	-2.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.84%	8.18%	-7.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29%	9.85%	-8.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.26%	14.25%	-12.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.08%	15.61%	-14.53%

GPPIX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPPIX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPPIX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

GPPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than GSIMX's 4.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GPPIX Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund	3.79%	4.51%	4.77%	3.68%	1.22%	0.30%	1.12%	2.61%	2.24%	1.33%	0.94%	0.49%
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	4.73%	5.12%	11.18%	2.36%	4.89%	2.23%	0.18%	0.65%	0.53%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPPIX and GSIMX in my portfolio?

GPPIX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GPPIX or GSIMX?

GSIMX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to GPPIX (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPPIX dropped -3.08% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.