GSAKX vs. SVAAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GSAKX (Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A) and SVAAX (Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - GSAKX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while SVAAX is a Dividend fund actively managed by Federated Hermes. Over the past 10 years, GSAKX returned 10.45%/yr vs 7.77%/yr for SVAAX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSAKX charges 1.40%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for SVAAX.

Performance

GSAKX vs. SVAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSAKX achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly higher than SVAAX's 8.08% return. Over the past 10 years, GSAKX has outperformed SVAAX with an annualized return of 10.45%, while SVAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.77% annualized return.

GSAKX

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 6M: 13.36%
• 1Y: 25.22%
• 3Y*: 19.41%
• 5Y*: 11.60%
• 10Y*: 10.45%

SVAAX

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -1.07%
• YTD: 8.08%
• 6M: 8.29%
• 1Y: 18.77%
• 3Y*: 14.86%
• 5Y*: 9.82%
• 10Y*: 7.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSAKX vs. SVAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSAKX Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A	9.75%	33.81%	8.50%	17.26%	-8.28%	13.26%	2.22%	26.54%	-12.40%	26.04%
SVAAX Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A	8.08%	14.42%	16.29%	-2.07%	8.07%	21.36%	-8.15%	19.42%	-8.44%	14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GSAKX and SVAAX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between GSAKX and SVAAX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GSAKX vs. SVAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSAKX

GSAKX Risk / Return Rank: 37
GSAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
GSAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GSAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
GSAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
GSAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

SVAAX

SVAAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
SVAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SVAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
SVAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SVAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SVAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSAKX vs. SVAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSAKX	SVAAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	2.22	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	3.26	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.37	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	4.87	-2.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.18	13.06	-4.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSAKX vs. SVAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSAKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the SVAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSAKX and SVAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSAKX	SVAAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	2.22	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.75	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	0.52	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.48	-0.22

Drawdowns

GSAKX vs. SVAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSAKX drawdown since its inception was -56.96%, which is greater than SVAAX's maximum drawdown of -51.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAKX and SVAAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSAKX	SVAAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.96%	-51.16%	-5.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.31%	-4.71%	-6.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.18%	-12.84%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.02%	-16.17%	-9.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.49%	-36.47%	+1.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.20%	-3.90%	+1.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.28%	-8.21%	-4.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	2.61%	+0.54%

Volatility

GSAKX vs. SVAAX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) at 3.63%. This indicates that GSAKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSAKX	SVAAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.61%	3.63%	+0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.75%	7.39%	+4.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.55%	10.31%	+4.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.70%	13.66%	+1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.14%	15.39%	+0.75%

GSAKX vs. SVAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSAKX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SVAAX's 1.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSAKX vs. SVAAX - Dividend Comparison

GSAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than SVAAX's 5.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSAKX Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A	3.41%	3.75%	2.93%	2.68%	0.51%	2.74%	1.73%	2.69%	15.27%	1.41%	2.01%	0.77%
SVAAX Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A	5.91%	5.80%	7.38%	4.10%	9.49%	3.50%	4.06%	8.55%	8.39%	10.16%	5.00%	8.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSAKX and SVAAX in my portfolio?

GSAKX and SVAAX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSAKX or SVAAX?

GSAKX has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to SVAAX (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSAKX dropped -56.96% vs SVAAX's -51.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SVAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.