GSAKX vs. FNDF
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF).
GSAKX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jun 25, 2007. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013.
Performance
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSAKX Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A | 0.47% | 33.81% | 8.50% | 17.26% | -8.28% | 13.26% | 2.22% | 26.54% | -12.40% | 26.04% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 8.23% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | 14.97% | 3.61% | 18.46% | -14.21% | 23.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSAKX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 8.23% return. Over the past 10 years, GSAKX has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 9.79%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.
GSAKX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -10.47%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
FNDF
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 40.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSAKX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSAKX vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank
GSAKX
FNDF
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSAKX | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 2.31 | -0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 3.02 | -1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.46 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 3.52 | -1.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 13.78 | -6.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSAKX | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 2.31 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.78 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.63 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.49 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSAKX and FNDF is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
GSAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than FNDF's 3.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSAKX Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A | 3.73% | 3.75% | 2.93% | 2.68% | 0.51% | 2.74% | 1.73% | 2.69% | 15.27% | 1.41% | 2.01% | 0.77% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.18% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
Drawdowns
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSAKX drawdown since its inception was -56.96%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAKX and FNDF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSAKX | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.96% | -40.14% | -16.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -11.08% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.02% | -25.56% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.49% | -40.14% | +5.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.47% | -7.26% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.36% | -7.72% | -4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 2.83% | +0.20% |
Volatility
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) is 6.86%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 8.06%. This indicates that GSAKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSAKX | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 8.06% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.42% | 11.42% | -1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.09% | 17.50% | -1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 16.05% | -1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 17.64% | -1.56% |