GSAKX vs. FNDF
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF).
GSAKX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jun 25, 2007. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSAKX or FNDF.
Correlation
The correlation between GSAKX and FNDF is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GSAKX:
0.81
FNDF:
0.35
GSAKX:
1.17
FNDF:
0.61
GSAKX:
1.16
FNDF:
1.08
GSAKX:
0.75
FNDF:
0.43
GSAKX:
3.61
FNDF:
1.27
GSAKX:
3.36%
FNDF:
4.68%
GSAKX:
14.93%
FNDF:
17.08%
GSAKX:
-75.31%
FNDF:
-40.14%
GSAKX:
-4.57%
FNDF:
-5.37%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSAKX achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly higher than FNDF's 6.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GSAKX has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 5.18%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 5.67% annualized return.
GSAKX
7.26%
-2.72%
3.72%
12.54%
14.04%
5.18%
FNDF
6.71%
-3.75%
0.63%
6.11%
14.72%
5.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSAKX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSAKX vs. FNDF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GSAKX
FNDF
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
GSAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than FNDF's 3.76% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSAKX Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.68% | 1.99% | 2.74% | 1.74% | 2.65% | 3.72% | 1.41% | 2.01% | 0.78% | 3.92% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.76% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% | 1.83% |
Drawdowns
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSAKX drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAKX and FNDF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) is 9.69%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 11.13%. This indicates that GSAKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.