GSAKX vs. FNDF
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF).
GSAKX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jun 25, 2007. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSAKX or FNDF.
Correlation
The correlation between GSAKX and FNDF is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
GSAKX:
0.91
FNDF:
0.58
GSAKX:
1.32
FNDF:
0.91
GSAKX:
1.18
FNDF:
1.12
GSAKX:
1.01
FNDF:
0.70
GSAKX:
4.11
FNDF:
2.06
GSAKX:
3.39%
FNDF:
4.70%
GSAKX:
15.14%
FNDF:
17.18%
GSAKX:
-75.31%
FNDF:
-40.14%
GSAKX:
0.00%
FNDF:
0.00%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSAKX having a 16.02% return and FNDF slightly higher at 16.05%. Over the past 10 years, GSAKX has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 5.60%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 6.28% annualized return.
GSAKX
16.02%
6.97%
14.64%
13.67%
13.82%
14.64%
5.60%
FNDF
16.05%
7.62%
13.28%
9.91%
11.71%
15.26%
6.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSAKX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSAKX vs. FNDF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GSAKX
FNDF
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
GSAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than FNDF's 3.46% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSAKX Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A | 2.53% | 2.93% | 2.68% | 1.99% | 2.74% | 1.74% | 2.65% | 3.72% | 1.41% | 2.01% | 0.78% | 3.92% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.46% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% | 1.83% |
Drawdowns
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSAKX drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAKX and FNDF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
GSAKX vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) have volatilities of 3.24% and 3.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...