PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSAKX vs. FNDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GSAKX vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GSAKX vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSAKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A
0.47%33.81%8.50%17.26%-8.28%13.26%2.22%26.54%-12.40%26.04%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
8.23%40.99%2.29%20.22%-7.78%14.97%3.61%18.46%-14.21%23.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSAKX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 8.23% return. Over the past 10 years, GSAKX has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 9.79%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.


GSAKX

1D
0.80%
1M
-10.47%
YTD
0.47%
6M
8.32%
1Y
22.32%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
11.53%
10Y*
9.79%

FNDF

1D
2.95%
1M
-7.26%
YTD
8.23%
6M
17.33%
1Y
40.22%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GSAKX vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSAKX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GSAKX vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSAKX
GSAKX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GSAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GSAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSAKX vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSAKXFNDFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

2.31

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

3.02

-1.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.46

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

3.52

-1.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.07

13.78

-6.71

GSAKX vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSAKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSAKX and FNDF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSAKXFNDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.31

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.78

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.63

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.49

-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between GSAKX and FNDF is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GSAKX vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

GSAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than FNDF's 3.18% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSAKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A
3.73%3.75%2.93%2.68%0.51%2.74%1.73%2.69%15.27%1.41%2.01%0.77%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
3.18%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%

Drawdowns

GSAKX vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSAKX drawdown since its inception was -56.96%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAKX and FNDF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GSAKXFNDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.96%

-40.14%

-16.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-11.08%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-25.56%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.49%

-40.14%

+5.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.47%

-7.26%

-3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.36%

-7.72%

-4.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.83%

+0.20%

Volatility

GSAKX vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) is 6.86%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 8.06%. This indicates that GSAKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GSAKXFNDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

8.06%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

11.42%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

17.50%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.44%

16.05%

-1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

17.64%

-1.56%