GSAKX vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GSAKX (Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GSAKX returned 10.49%/yr vs 12.01%/yr for FNDF. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSAKX charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

GSAKX vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSAKX achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 22.03% return. Over the past 10 years, GSAKX has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 10.49%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.01% annualized return.

GSAKX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 10.17%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 25.38%
• 3Y*: 19.56%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: 10.49%

FNDF

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 6.57%
• YTD: 22.03%
• 6M: 26.38%
• 1Y: 44.73%
• 3Y*: 24.37%
• 5Y*: 13.68%
• 10Y*: 12.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSAKX vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSAKX Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A	10.17%	33.81%	8.50%	17.26%	-8.28%	13.26%	2.22%	26.54%	-12.40%	26.04%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF	22.03%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GSAKX and FNDF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.92

The correlation between GSAKX and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GSAKX vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSAKX

GSAKX Risk / Return Rank: 39
GSAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GSAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
GSAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
GSAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GSAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 85
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSAKX vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSAKX	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	2.99	-1.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	3.89	-1.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.53	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	4.38	-1.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.70	16.77	-8.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSAKX vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSAKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSAKX and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSAKX	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	2.99	-1.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.85	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	0.68	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.54	-0.28

Drawdowns

GSAKX vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSAKX drawdown since its inception was -56.96%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAKX and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSAKX	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.96%	-40.14%	-16.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.31%	-10.60%	-0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.18%	-13.89%	+1.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.02%	-25.56%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.49%	-40.14%	+5.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.83%	0.00%	-1.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.28%	-7.65%	-4.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	2.77%	+0.37%

Volatility

GSAKX vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) is 4.88%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that GSAKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSAKX	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	5.34%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.75%	12.51%	-0.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.57%	15.07%	-0.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.70%	16.18%	-1.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.14%	17.67%	-1.53%

GSAKX vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSAKX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSAKX vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

GSAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than FNDF's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF	2.82%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
GSAKX Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A	3.40%	3.75%	2.93%	2.68%	0.51%	2.74%	1.73%	2.69%	15.27%	1.41%	2.01%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSAKX and FNDF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, GSAKX and FNDF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GSAKX or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to GSAKX (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSAKX dropped -56.96% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.