PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSAKX vs. FINVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSAKX vs. FINVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Fidelity Series International Value Fund (FINVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSAKX achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly higher than FINVX's 7.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSAKX having a 10.49% annualized return and FINVX not far ahead at 10.57%.


GSAKX

1D
-0.42%
1M
2.12%
YTD
10.17%
6M
14.33%
1Y
25.38%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
10.49%

FINVX

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.27%
YTD
7.12%
6M
11.57%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
13.25%
10Y*
10.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSAKX vs. FINVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSAKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A
10.17%33.81%8.50%17.26%-8.28%13.26%2.22%26.54%-12.40%26.04%
FINVX
Fidelity Series International Value Fund
7.12%45.75%6.20%20.35%-7.21%16.39%4.87%19.85%-16.40%20.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GSAKX and FINVX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2009

0.94

The correlation between GSAKX and FINVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSAKX vs. FINVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSAKX
GSAKX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GSAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GSAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FINVX
FINVX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FINVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FINVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FINVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FINVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FINVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSAKX vs. FINVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Fidelity Series International Value Fund (FINVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSAKXFINVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

1.67

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

2.37

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.30

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.42

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.70

9.00

-0.30

GSAKX vs. FINVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSAKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FINVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSAKX and FINVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSAKXFINVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.67

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.80

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.59

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.37

-0.11

Drawdowns

GSAKX vs. FINVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSAKX drawdown since its inception was -56.96%, which is greater than FINVX's maximum drawdown of -42.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAKX and FINVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSAKXFINVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.96%

-42.48%

-14.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-10.38%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.18%

-14.60%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-27.13%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.49%

-42.48%

+7.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-1.47%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.28%

-9.04%

-3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.79%

+0.35%

Volatility

GSAKX vs. FINVX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Fidelity Series International Value Fund (FINVX) have volatilities of 4.88% and 4.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSAKXFINVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

4.85%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.75%

11.94%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.57%

14.87%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

16.71%

-2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

18.06%

-1.92%

GSAKX vs. FINVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSAKX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FINVX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSAKX vs. FINVX - Dividend Comparison

GSAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than FINVX's 10.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FINVX
Fidelity Series International Value Fund
10.45%11.20%4.14%3.29%3.33%5.01%2.83%4.05%4.05%3.14%2.62%2.14%
GSAKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A
3.40%3.75%2.93%2.68%0.51%2.74%1.73%2.69%15.27%1.41%2.01%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GSAKX and FINVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GSAKX has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to FINVX (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSAKX dropped -56.96% vs FINVX's -42.48%.

GSAKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSAKX and FINVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer