GRW vs. SPYG
GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TCW, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. GRW is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
GRW vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GRW
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 23.89%
- 3Y*
- 25.06%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- 17.58%
GRW vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 1.86% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | -1.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRW and SPYG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.79 |
GRW vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GRW
SPYG
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
GRW
SPYG
Technology
GRW
SPYG
Financial Services
GRW
SPYG
Communication Services
GRW
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
GRW
SPYG
Basic Materials
GRW
SPYG
Healthcare
GRW
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
GRW
-
SPYG
Energy
GRW
-
SPYG
Real Estate
GRW
-
SPYG
Utilities
GRW
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRW vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
GRW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPYG
GRW vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRW | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRW vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRW drawdown since its inception was -3.83%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRW and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRW | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -67.63% | +63.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.91% | -3.55% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.07% | -24.24% | +23.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.58% | — |
Volatility
GRW vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRW | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 17.49% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 21.42% | -4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 20.73% | -3.79% |
GRW vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRW vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.49% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRW and SPYG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.
GRW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: TCW and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRW and 0.04% for SPYG.
Find the right allocation for GRW and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer