GRNJ vs. IJH
GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. GRNJ is actively managed, while IJH is passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRNJ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.
Performance
GRNJ vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRNJ achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 15.01% return.
GRNJ
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -9.10%
- 6M
- -1.21%
- YTD
- 11.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IJH
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- YTD
- 15.01%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 13.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
GRNJ vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 11.39% | 6.02% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 15.01% | 5.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRNJ and IJH is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRNJ vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank
GRNJ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IJH
GRNJ vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRNJ | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.44 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRNJ vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRNJ drawdown since its inception was -17.32%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNJ and IJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRNJ | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.32% | -55.07% | +37.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.70% | -2.04% | -10.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.47% | -7.54% | +3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.44% | — |
Volatility
GRNJ vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRNJ | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.39% | 15.77% | +14.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.39% | 19.72% | +10.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.39% | 21.12% | +9.27% |
GRNJ vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRNJ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRNJ vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRNJ and IJH have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.
IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.
They also come from different issuers: Fundstrat and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRNJ and 0.05% for IJH.
Find the right allocation for GRNJ and IJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer