GRNI vs. XOMO
GRNI (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF) and XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.24 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GRNI charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for XOMO.
Performance
GRNI vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRNI achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 20.26% return.
GRNI
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 7.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XOMO
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 10.95%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 20.26%
- 1Y
- 29.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $815.80K | $598.17K | $720.77K | |
| $613.93K | $674.71K | $709.58K |
GRNI vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GRNI Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF | 7.63% | 2.24% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 20.26% | 1.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRNI and XOMO is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRNI vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank
GRNI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XOMO
GRNI vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRNI | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.12 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRNI vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRNI drawdown since its inception was -9.55%, smaller than the maximum XOMO drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNI and XOMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRNI | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.55% | -18.90% | +9.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -7.57% | +5.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -7.50% | +5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.90% | — |
Volatility
GRNI vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRNI | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.90% | 20.68% | -3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 19.20% | -2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 19.20% | -2.30% |
GRNI vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRNI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRNI vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison
GRNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, less than XOMO's 37.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNI Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF | 6.63% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 37.04% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRNI and XOMO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GRNI is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GRNI is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 37.04%, compared with 6.63% for GRNI.
They also come from different issuers: Tidal and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GRNI and 1.01% for XOMO.
Find the right allocation for GRNI and XOMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer