GRNI vs. SCHG
GRNI (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRNI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Tidal, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. GRNI is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GRNI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
GRNI vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRNI achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 9.14% return.
GRNI
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 10.10%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 13.23%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 1Y
- 18.46%
- 3Y*
- 24.14%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- 18.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $745.14K | $669.94K | $736.31K | |
| $253.95M | $251.67M | $339.26M |
GRNI vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GRNI Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF | 10.53% | 2.24% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 9.14% | 2.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRNI and SCHG is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRNI vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
GRNI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHG
GRNI vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRNI | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRNI vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRNI drawdown since its inception was -9.55%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNI and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRNI | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.55% | -34.59% | +25.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -5.19% | +3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.19% | — |
Volatility
GRNI vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRNI | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.95% | 16.72% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 22.46% | -5.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 21.61% | -4.66% |
GRNI vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRNI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRNI vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
GRNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNI Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF | 6.46% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRNI and SCHG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GRNI.
GRNI has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.
GRNI is categorized as Derivative Income, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GRNI and 0.04% for SCHG.
Find the right allocation for GRNI and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer