GRNI vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GRNI (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRNI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Tidal, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. GRNI is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GRNI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

GRNI vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRNI achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.23% return.

GRNI

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -0.64%
• YTD: 6.75%
• 6M: 4.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -4.04%
• YTD: 1.23%
• 6M: -0.27%
• 1Y: 16.03%
• 3Y*: 22.08%
• 5Y*: 13.26%
• 10Y*: 18.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRNI vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GRNI Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF	6.75%	2.24%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	1.23%	2.10%

Correlation

The correlation between GRNI and SCHG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.83

Return for Risk

GRNI vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRNI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 27
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 28
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNI vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GRNI	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.00	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.42	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.18	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.98	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.19	—

Drawdowns

GRNI vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNI drawdown since its inception was -9.55%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNI and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRNI	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.55%	-34.59%	+25.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.41%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.27%	-6.57%	+3.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.12%	-5.20%	+3.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GRNI	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.90%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.46%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.52%	16.21%	+1.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.52%	22.38%	-4.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.52%	21.58%	-4.06%

GRNI vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRNI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

GRNI vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

GRNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRNI Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF	4.92%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRNI and SCHG in my portfolio?

GRNI and SCHG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GRNI or SCHG?

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GRNI or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GRNI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GRNI or SCHG?

GRNI has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between GRNI and SCHG?

GRNI is categorized as Derivative Income, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GRNI and 0.04% for SCHG.