PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRNB vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRNB vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRNB achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return.


GRNB

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.57%
1Y
4.99%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRNB vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
0.43%7.09%3.31%7.08%-11.93%-2.36%7.98%5.40%-4.07%9.87%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%14.53%

Correlation

The correlation between GRNB and VOO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2017

0.17

Over the past year, GRNB and VOO have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

GRNB vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GRNB
VOO

Financial Services

0.1%
11.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.7%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

GRNB
0.1%
VOO
11.6%

Basic Materials

GRNB

-

VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

GRNB

-

VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GRNB

-

VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

GRNB

-

VOO
4.9%

Energy

GRNB

-

VOO
3.5%

Healthcare

GRNB

-

VOO
8.5%

Industrials

GRNB

-

VOO
8.3%

Real Estate

GRNB

-

VOO
1.9%

Technology

GRNB

-

VOO
35.7%

Utilities

GRNB

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRNB vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRNB
GRNB Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GRNB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRNB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRNB Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GRNB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRNB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNB vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRNBVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.43

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

3.16

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.82

14.73

-6.91

GRNB vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRNB Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRNB and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRNBVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.39

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.83

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.89

-0.43

Drawdowns

GRNB vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNB drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNB and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRNBVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.08%

-33.99%

+15.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-8.90%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.24%

-18.69%

+14.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.94%

-24.52%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.70%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-3.69%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

1.91%

-1.27%

Volatility

GRNB vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) is 0.93%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that GRNB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRNBVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

2.84%

-1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.34%

8.90%

-6.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96%

11.80%

-8.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

16.81%

-11.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.88%

18.01%

-13.13%

GRNB vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRNB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GRNB vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

GRNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
4.24%4.18%3.83%3.17%2.60%1.97%2.24%1.79%1.21%1.09%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRNB and VOO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to GRNB (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRNB dropped -18.08% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.90% vs 0.77% for GRNB. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, GRNB has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.90% return vs 0.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GRNB.

GRNB has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

GRNB is categorized as Global Bonds, while VOO is S&P 500. GRNB tracks S&P Green Bond U.S. Dollar Select Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GRNB and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRNB and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer