GRNB vs. BGRN
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and iShares Global Green Bond ETF (BGRN).
GRNB and BGRN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GRNB is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the S&P Green Bond Select Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2017. BGRN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays MSCI Green Bond Select USD Hedged Index. It was launched on Nov 13, 2018. Both GRNB and BGRN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GRNB or BGRN.
Correlation
The correlation between GRNB and BGRN is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GRNB vs. BGRN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GRNB:
1.02
BGRN:
0.82
GRNB:
1.51
BGRN:
1.16
GRNB:
1.18
BGRN:
1.14
GRNB:
0.44
BGRN:
0.30
GRNB:
3.62
BGRN:
2.71
GRNB:
1.16%
BGRN:
1.32%
GRNB:
4.10%
BGRN:
4.36%
GRNB:
-18.07%
BGRN:
-19.16%
GRNB:
-4.58%
BGRN:
-7.59%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRNB achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly higher than BGRN's 0.04% return.
GRNB
0.27%
-0.45%
1.53%
4.40%
0.47%
N/A
BGRN
0.04%
-0.69%
1.30%
3.67%
-0.38%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GRNB vs. BGRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GRNB and BGRN have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GRNB vs. BGRN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GRNB
BGRN
GRNB vs. BGRN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and iShares Global Green Bond ETF (BGRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GRNB vs. BGRN - Dividend Comparison
GRNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than BGRN's 4.06% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNB VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF | 3.82% | 3.83% | 3.18% | 2.61% | 1.98% | 2.24% | 1.80% | 1.22% | 1.10% |
BGRN iShares Global Green Bond ETF | 4.06% | 4.06% | 3.52% | 2.67% | 0.78% | 1.82% | 3.66% | 0.21% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GRNB vs. BGRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRNB drawdown since its inception was -18.07%, smaller than the maximum BGRN drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNB and BGRN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GRNB vs. BGRN - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF (GRNB) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to iShares Global Green Bond ETF (BGRN) at 1.23%. This indicates that GRNB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.