PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GRNB vs. BNDX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GRNBBNDX
YTD Return3.53%2.78%
1Y Return8.28%7.26%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.75%-0.95%
5Y Return (Ann)0.63%-0.08%
Sharpe Ratio2.111.93
Sortino Ratio3.252.96
Omega Ratio1.391.34
Calmar Ratio0.780.71
Martin Ratio10.787.14
Ulcer Index0.88%1.13%
Daily Std Dev4.47%4.19%
Max Drawdown-18.07%-16.23%
Current Drawdown-4.65%-4.80%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between GRNB and BNDX is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GRNB vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GRNB achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 2.78% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.18%
2.96%
GRNB
BNDX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GRNB vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRNB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


GRNB
VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for GRNB: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%
Expense ratio chart for BNDX: current value at 0.07% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.07%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GRNB vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRNB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GRNB, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.11
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GRNB, currently valued at 3.25, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GRNB, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.39
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GRNB, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GRNB, currently valued at 10.78, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0010.78
BNDX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BNDX, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.93
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BNDX, currently valued at 2.96, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.96
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BNDX, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BNDX, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.71
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BNDX, currently valued at 7.14, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.007.14

GRNB vs. BNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRNB Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the BNDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRNB and BNDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.11
1.93
GRNB
BNDX

Dividends

GRNB vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison

GRNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than BNDX's 4.78% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GRNB
VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF
3.72%3.18%2.61%1.98%2.24%1.80%1.22%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.78%4.42%1.52%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%1.54%0.86%

Drawdowns

GRNB vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNB drawdown since its inception was -18.07%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNB and BNDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-9.00%-8.00%-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.65%
-4.80%
GRNB
BNDX

Volatility

GRNB vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF (GRNB) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 0.94%. This indicates that GRNB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.10%
0.94%
GRNB
BNDX