GRMRX vs. PUTW

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GRMRX (Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R) and PUTW (WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund) are both mutual funds - GRMRX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while PUTW is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Volos U.S. Large Cap Target 2.5% PutWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GRMRX returned 14.67%/yr vs 8.33%/yr for PUTW. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRMRX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for PUTW.

Performance

GRMRX vs. PUTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R (GRMRX) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRMRX achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly higher than PUTW's 4.36% return. Over the past 10 years, GRMRX has outperformed PUTW with an annualized return of 14.67%, while PUTW has yielded a comparatively lower 8.33% annualized return.

GRMRX

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 6M: 9.25%
• 1Y: 26.14%
• 3Y*: 19.78%
• 5Y*: 13.02%
• 10Y*: 14.67%

PUTW

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 4.36%
• 6M: 3.64%
• 1Y: 18.38%
• 3Y*: 13.18%
• 5Y*: 9.62%
• 10Y*: 8.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRMRX vs. PUTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GRMRX Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R	9.75%	16.90%	23.49%	25.00%	-18.86%	27.62%	17.38%	30.41%	-4.21%	20.78%
PUTW WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund	4.36%	14.45%	17.18%	15.53%	-10.11%	20.94%	1.65%	13.55%	-7.16%	10.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GRMRX and PUTW is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016	0.79

The correlation between GRMRX and PUTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GRMRX vs. PUTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRMRX

GRMRX Risk / Return Rank: 61
GRMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
GRMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
GRMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GRMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
GRMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

PUTW

PUTW Risk / Return Rank: 57
PUTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PUTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PUTW Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PUTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
PUTW Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRMRX vs. PUTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R (GRMRX) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GRMRX	PUTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	2.00	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	2.79	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.40	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	2.58	+0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.93	12.19	+0.74

GRMRX vs. PUTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRMRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the PUTW Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRMRX and PUTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GRMRX vs. PUTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRMRX drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, which is greater than PUTW's maximum drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRMRX and PUTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRMRX	PUTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.25%	-28.40%	-23.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.01%	-7.15%	-1.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.84%	-15.26%	-3.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.04%	-16.56%	-8.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.87%	-28.40%	-5.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	-0.39%	-1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.99%	-3.43%	-3.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	1.51%	+0.50%

Volatility

GRMRX vs. PUTW - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R (GRMRX) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW) at 3.19%. This indicates that GRMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRMRX	PUTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	3.19%	+1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.90%	7.55%	+2.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	9.27%	+3.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.04%	12.21%	+4.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.12%	13.26%	+4.86%

GRMRX vs. PUTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRMRX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than PUTW's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

GRMRX vs. PUTW - Dividend Comparison

GRMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than PUTW's 12.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRMRX Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R	4.31%	4.74%	2.21%	0.47%	1.20%	4.63%	0.86%	5.98%	18.24%	6.42%	7.16%	11.57%
PUTW WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund	12.05%	13.18%	11.99%	8.94%	3.27%	0.00%	1.43%	1.47%	6.46%	3.52%	2.27%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRMRX and PUTW in my portfolio?

GRMRX and PUTW have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GRMRX or PUTW?

GRMRX has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to PUTW (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRMRX dropped -52.25% vs PUTW's -28.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GRMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.