PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUTW vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PUTW vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund (PUTW) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PUTW

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

XYLD

1D
0.49%
1M
1.82%
6M
6.81%
YTD
8.05%
1Y
18.90%
3Y*
11.51%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
8.34%
ALL TIME*
8.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$36.93M$37.58M$32.35M

PUTW vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUTW
WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund
0.00%-2.80%17.19%14.01%-11.11%20.92%1.67%13.55%-8.07%9.88%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
8.05%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PUTW and XYLD is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.66

The correlation between PUTW and XYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.67 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUTW vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PUTW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PUTW vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund (PUTW) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PUTWXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.69

PUTW vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PUTW vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUTWXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

Volatility

PUTW vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUTWXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.15%

PUTW vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUTW has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PUTW vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

PUTW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PUTW
WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund
0.00%4.16%11.99%7.63%2.16%0.00%1.43%1.47%5.49%3.33%2.27%0.00%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.53%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


PUTW and XYLD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PUTW is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PUTW is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.53%, compared with 0.00% for PUTW.

PUTW tracks Volos U.S. Large Cap Target 2.5% PutWrite Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for PUTW and 0.60% for XYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUTW and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer