PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUTW vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PUTW vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund (PUTW) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PUTW

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

QYLD

1D
0.65%
1M
-0.98%
6M
5.88%
YTD
7.67%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
12.32%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
9.59%
ALL TIME*
8.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$83.30M$78.68M$98.28M

PUTW vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUTW
WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund
0.00%-2.80%17.19%14.01%-11.11%20.92%1.67%13.55%-8.07%9.88%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.67%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PUTW and QYLD is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.66

The correlation between PUTW and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.66 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUTW vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PUTW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PUTW vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund (PUTW) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PUTWQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.70

PUTW vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PUTW vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUTWQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

Volatility

PUTW vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUTWQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

PUTW vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUTW has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PUTW vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

PUTW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PUTW
WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund
0.00%4.16%11.99%7.63%2.16%0.00%1.43%1.47%5.49%3.33%2.27%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.89%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


PUTW and QYLD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PUTW is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PUTW is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.89%, compared with 0.00% for PUTW.

PUTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. PUTW tracks Volos U.S. Large Cap Target 2.5% PutWrite Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for PUTW and 0.60% for QYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUTW and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer