PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUTW vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PUTW vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUTW achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.94% return. Over the past 10 years, PUTW has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 8.32%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.80% annualized return.


PUTW

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.14%
YTD
4.45%
6M
5.19%
1Y
19.36%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
8.32%

QYLD

1D
0.11%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.94%
6M
10.09%
1Y
24.45%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUTW vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUTW
WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
4.45%14.45%17.18%15.53%-10.11%20.94%1.65%13.55%-7.16%10.09%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.94%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PUTW and QYLD is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016

0.72

The correlation between PUTW and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

PUTW vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PUTW
QYLD

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

-0.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

PUTW

-

QYLD
1.1%

Communication Services

PUTW

-

QYLD
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PUTW

-

QYLD
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

PUTW

-

QYLD
7.7%

Energy

PUTW

-

QYLD
0.6%

Healthcare

PUTW

-

QYLD
4.2%

Industrials

PUTW

-

QYLD
2.8%

Real Estate

PUTW

-

QYLD
0.1%

Technology

PUTW

-

QYLD
53.8%

Utilities

PUTW

-

QYLD
1.4%

Financial Services

PUTW
-0.0%
QYLD
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUTW vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUTW
PUTW Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PUTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUTW Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PUTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUTW Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUTW vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PUTWQYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

2.86

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.06

3.99

-0.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.64

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

5.03

-2.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.14

29.54

-16.40

PUTW vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUTW Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUTW and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PUTWQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.86

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.59

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.63

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.59

+0.06

Drawdowns

PUTW vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUTW drawdown since its inception was -28.40%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUTW and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUTWQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.40%

-24.75%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-4.97%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-19.06%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.56%

-24.61%

+8.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

-24.75%

-3.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-3.84%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

0.85%

+0.64%

Volatility

PUTW vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW) is 0.86%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that PUTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUTWQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

1.85%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.00%

7.12%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.86%

8.58%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.13%

14.70%

-2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.22%

15.50%

-2.28%

PUTW vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUTW has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PUTW vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

PUTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.03%, more than QYLD's 11.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PUTW
WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
12.03%13.18%11.99%8.94%3.27%0.00%1.43%1.47%6.46%3.52%2.27%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.45%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


PUTW and QYLD have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QYLD has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to PUTW (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUTW dropped -28.40% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUTW and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer