PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRMRX vs. MSXAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRMRX vs. MSXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R (GRMRX) and NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GRMRX having a 8.79% return and MSXAX slightly higher at 9.05%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GRMRX having a 14.09% annualized return and MSXAX not far ahead at 14.43%.


GRMRX

1D
1.64%
1M
-0.63%
6M
7.34%
YTD
8.79%
1Y
19.66%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
11.62%
10Y*
14.09%
ALL TIME*
10.38%

MSXAX

1D
1.66%
1M
-0.60%
6M
7.54%
YTD
9.05%
1Y
20.04%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
14.43%
ALL TIME*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GRMRX vs. MSXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRMRX
Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R
8.79%16.90%23.49%25.00%-18.86%27.62%17.38%30.41%-4.21%20.78%
MSXAX
NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A
9.05%17.26%23.98%25.96%-18.52%28.13%17.86%30.69%-4.71%21.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GRMRX and MSXAX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

1.00

The correlation between GRMRX and MSXAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRMRX vs. MSXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GRMRX
GRMRX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GRMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GRMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

MSXAX
MSXAX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MSXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MSXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GRMRX vs. MSXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R (GRMRX) and NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRMRXMSXAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.99

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.19

8.50

-0.31

GRMRX vs. MSXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRMRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the MSXAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRMRX and MSXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRMRX vs. MSXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRMRX drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, smaller than the maximum MSXAX drawdown of -55.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRMRX and MSXAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRMRXMSXAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.25%

-55.48%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-8.97%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.84%

-18.78%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-24.78%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

-33.79%

-0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-2.16%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-7.13%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

2.10%

+0.02%

Volatility

GRMRX vs. MSXAX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R (GRMRX) and NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX) have volatilities of 3.42% and 3.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRMRXMSXAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

3.44%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

10.08%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

12.87%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

17.03%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

18.08%

0.00%

GRMRX vs. MSXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRMRX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than MSXAX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRMRX vs. MSXAX - Dividend Comparison

GRMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than MSXAX's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRMRX
Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R
4.35%4.74%2.21%0.47%1.20%4.63%0.86%5.98%18.24%6.42%7.16%11.57%
MSXAX
NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A
0.97%1.06%5.20%4.04%10.30%4.44%8.78%17.42%14.49%15.18%9.63%5.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, GRMRX and MSXAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MSXAX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to GRMRX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRMRX dropped -52.25% vs MSXAX's -55.48%.

MSXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRMRX and MSXAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer