PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRMRX vs. KNGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRMRX vs. KNGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R (GRMRX) and CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRMRX achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly higher than KNGLX's 6.27% return.


GRMRX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
7.67%
6M
6.33%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
14.71%

KNGLX

1D
0.97%
1M
3.14%
YTD
6.27%
6M
5.34%
1Y
12.28%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRMRX vs. KNGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GRMRX
Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R
7.67%16.90%23.49%25.00%-18.86%27.62%17.38%30.41%-4.21%
KNGLX
CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund
6.27%6.43%2.91%6.46%-7.29%23.23%7.08%26.58%-4.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GRMRX and KNGLX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between GRMRX and KNGLX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRMRX vs. KNGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRMRX
GRMRX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
GRMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GRMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

KNGLX
KNGLX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
KNGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRMRX vs. KNGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R (GRMRX) and CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRMRXKNGLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.18

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

1.28

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.50

3.37

+7.13

GRMRX vs. KNGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRMRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the KNGLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRMRX and KNGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRMRX vs. KNGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRMRX drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, which is greater than KNGLX's maximum drawdown of -31.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRMRX and KNGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRMRXKNGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.25%

-31.48%

-20.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-8.90%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.84%

-14.79%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-18.25%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

-2.26%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-4.61%

-2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

3.38%

-1.35%

Volatility

GRMRX vs. KNGLX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R (GRMRX) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX) at 3.26%. This indicates that GRMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRMRXKNGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

3.26%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

7.95%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

10.83%

+1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

14.02%

+3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

17.12%

+0.97%

GRMRX vs. KNGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRMRX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than KNGLX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRMRX vs. KNGLX - Dividend Comparison

GRMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than KNGLX's 12.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRMRX
Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R
4.39%4.74%2.21%0.47%1.20%4.63%0.86%5.98%18.24%6.42%7.16%11.57%
KNGLX
CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund
12.33%8.02%9.60%7.99%4.54%4.41%3.53%4.53%4.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRMRX and KNGLX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRMRX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to KNGLX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRMRX dropped -52.25% vs KNGLX's -31.48%.

GRMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRMRX and KNGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer