GRMRX vs. PSPCX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GRMRX (Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R) and PSPCX (PIMCO StocksPLUS Fund Class C) are both S&P 500 funds. GRMRX is passively managed, while PSPCX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, GRMRX returned 14.67%/yr vs 14.30%/yr for PSPCX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GRMRX charges 0.93%/yr vs 1.69%/yr for PSPCX.

Performance

GRMRX vs. PSPCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R (GRMRX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Fund Class C (PSPCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GRMRX having a 9.75% return and PSPCX slightly higher at 10.02%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GRMRX having a 14.67% annualized return and PSPCX not far behind at 14.30%.

GRMRX

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 6M: 9.25%
• 1Y: 26.14%
• 3Y*: 19.78%
• 5Y*: 13.02%
• 10Y*: 14.67%

PSPCX

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 10.02%
• 6M: 1.10%
• 1Y: 17.18%
• 3Y*: 15.92%
• 5Y*: 9.87%
• 10Y*: 14.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRMRX vs. PSPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GRMRX Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R	9.75%	16.90%	23.49%	25.00%	-18.86%	27.62%	17.38%	30.41%	-4.21%	20.78%
PSPCX PIMCO StocksPLUS Fund Class C	10.02%	7.00%	22.72%	24.17%	-21.92%	26.86%	17.29%	47.57%	-6.34%	21.34%

Correlation

The correlation between GRMRX and PSPCX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008	0.98

The correlation between GRMRX and PSPCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GRMRX vs. PSPCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRMRX

GRMRX Risk / Return Rank: 61
GRMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
GRMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
GRMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GRMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
GRMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

PSPCX

PSPCX Risk / Return Rank: 16
PSPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
PSPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
PSPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PSPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
PSPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRMRX vs. PSPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R (GRMRX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Fund Class C (PSPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GRMRX	PSPCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	1.13	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	1.44	+1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.24	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	1.09	+1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.93	3.17	+9.76

GRMRX vs. PSPCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRMRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the PSPCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRMRX and PSPCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GRMRX vs. PSPCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRMRX drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, smaller than the maximum PSPCX drawdown of -63.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRMRX and PSPCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRMRX	PSPCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.25%	-63.07%	+10.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.01%	-15.74%	+6.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.84%	-20.40%	+1.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.04%	-27.83%	+2.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.87%	-36.46%	+2.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	-1.23%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.99%	-10.94%	+3.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	5.37%	-3.36%

Volatility

GRMRX vs. PSPCX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R (GRMRX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Fund Class C (PSPCX) have volatilities of 4.77% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRMRX	PSPCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	4.60%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.90%	13.12%	-3.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	15.06%	-2.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.04%	17.70%	-0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.12%	18.94%	-0.82%

GRMRX vs. PSPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRMRX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than PSPCX's 1.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

GRMRX vs. PSPCX - Dividend Comparison

GRMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than PSPCX's 18.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRMRX Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R	4.31%	4.74%	2.21%	0.47%	1.20%	4.63%	0.86%	5.98%	18.24%	6.42%	7.16%	11.57%
PSPCX PIMCO StocksPLUS Fund Class C	18.41%	16.57%	14.61%	2.25%	11.36%	16.99%	4.05%	27.22%	23.19%	0.76%	0.40%	11.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRMRX and PSPCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, GRMRX and PSPCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GRMRX or PSPCX?

GRMRX has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to PSPCX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRMRX dropped -52.25% vs PSPCX's -63.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GRMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.