GRMN vs. WSM
GRMN (Garmin Ltd.) and WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) are both stocks. GRMN operates in Scientific & Technical Instruments (Technology), while WSM operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, GRMN returned 22.02%/yr vs 27.10%/yr for WSM. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRMN vs. WSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRMN achieves a 17.83% return, which is significantly lower than WSM's 26.06% return. Over the past 10 years, GRMN has underperformed WSM with an annualized return of 22.02%, while WSM has yielded a comparatively higher 27.10% annualized return.
GRMN
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 17.83%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 20.22%
- 3Y*
- 32.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 22.02%
WSM
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 32.55%
- YTD
- 26.06%
- 6M
- 20.02%
- 1Y
- 47.32%
- 3Y*
- 53.75%
- 5Y*
- 23.70%
- 10Y*
- 27.10%
GRMN vs. WSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 17.83% | -0.06% | 63.25% | 43.12% | -30.20% | 15.90% | 25.86% | 58.13% | 9.84% | 27.60% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 26.06% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -30.49% | 68.60% | 42.38% | 50.07% | 0.61% | 10.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRMN and WSM is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2000 | 0.36 |
The correlation between GRMN and WSM shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GRMN:
$46.09B
WSM:
$26.80B
GRMN:
$8.97
WSM:
$8.93
GRMN:
26.55
WSM:
25.04
GRMN:
2.13
WSM:
5.06
GRMN:
6.18
WSM:
3.46
GRMN:
4.97
WSM:
14.33
GRMN:
$7.46B
WSM:
$7.88B
GRMN:
$4.41B
WSM:
$3.63B
GRMN:
$2.26B
WSM:
$1.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRMN vs. WSM — Risk / Return Rank
GRMN
WSM
GRMN vs. WSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRMN | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.23 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 2.01 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.27 | 4.55 | -3.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRMN vs. WSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRMN drawdown since its inception was -87.71%, roughly equal to the maximum WSM drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRMN and WSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRMN | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.71% | -89.01% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.97% | -23.27% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.97% | -36.79% | +8.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.63% | -51.92% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.63% | -59.71% | +5.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.00% | 0.00% | -11.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.54% | -25.03% | -6.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.79% | 10.25% | +2.54% |
Volatility
GRMN vs. WSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) is 8.24%, while Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a volatility of 12.02%. This indicates that GRMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRMN | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 12.02% | -3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | 25.57% | -3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.32% | 34.63% | -4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.41% | 44.77% | -14.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.36% | 44.26% | -15.90% |
Dividends
GRMN vs. WSM - Dividend Comparison
GRMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than WSM's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 1.51% | 1.70% | 1.44% | 2.27% | 3.10% | 1.92% | 2.01% | 2.30% | 3.32% | 3.42% | 4.21% | 5.41% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.23% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
Financials
GRMN vs. WSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Garmin Ltd. and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GRMN vs. WSM - Profitability Comparison
GRMN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.
GRMN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported an operating income of 431.67M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.6%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
GRMN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported a net income of 405.08M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in a net margin of 23.1%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRMN and WSM have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WSM has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to GRMN (8.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRMN dropped -87.71% vs WSM's -89.01%.
WSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRMN and WSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer