PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GRMN vs. CSCO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GRMNCSCO
YTD Return67.66%19.83%
1Y Return85.86%15.11%
3Y Return (Ann)17.12%4.26%
5Y Return (Ann)20.19%7.19%
10Y Return (Ann)17.99%11.82%
Sharpe Ratio2.610.80
Sortino Ratio4.861.15
Omega Ratio1.731.18
Calmar Ratio2.870.69
Martin Ratio20.812.19
Ulcer Index4.22%7.49%
Daily Std Dev33.69%20.44%
Max Drawdown-87.71%-89.26%
Current Drawdown-0.08%0.00%

Fundamentals


GRMNCSCO
Market Cap$40.82B$233.70B
EPS$7.86$2.54
PE Ratio27.0423.08
PEG Ratio3.122.47
Total Revenue (TTM)$5.96B$39.14B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.48B$25.60B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.58B$10.71B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between GRMN and CSCO is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GRMN vs. CSCO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GRMN achieves a 67.66% return, which is significantly higher than CSCO's 19.83% return. Over the past 10 years, GRMN has outperformed CSCO with an annualized return of 17.99%, while CSCO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.82% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
26.21%
21.73%
GRMN
CSCO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GRMN vs. CSCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRMN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GRMN, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GRMN, currently valued at 4.86, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.86
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GRMN, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.73
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GRMN, currently valued at 2.87, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.87
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GRMN, currently valued at 20.81, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0020.81
CSCO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CSCO, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.80
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CSCO, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.15
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CSCO, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CSCO, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.69
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CSCO, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.19

GRMN vs. CSCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRMN Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the CSCO Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRMN and CSCO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.61
0.80
GRMN
CSCO

Dividends

GRMN vs. CSCO - Dividend Comparison

GRMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than CSCO's 2.71% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GRMN
Garmin Ltd.
1.39%2.27%3.10%1.92%2.01%2.30%3.32%3.42%4.21%5.41%3.58%3.90%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.71%3.07%3.17%2.32%3.20%2.88%2.95%2.95%3.28%3.02%2.66%2.27%

Drawdowns

GRMN vs. CSCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRMN drawdown since its inception was -87.71%, roughly equal to the maximum CSCO drawdown of -89.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRMN and CSCO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.08%
0
GRMN
CSCO

Volatility

GRMN vs. CSCO - Volatility Comparison

Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) has a higher volatility of 21.63% compared to Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) at 5.79%. This indicates that GRMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
21.63%
5.79%
GRMN
CSCO

Financials

GRMN vs. CSCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Garmin Ltd. and Cisco Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items