PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GRMN vs. SPY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GRMN and SPY is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

GRMN vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
20.75%
11.30%
GRMN
SPY

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GRMN:

2.20

SPY:

1.95

Sortino Ratio

GRMN:

4.24

SPY:

2.60

Omega Ratio

GRMN:

1.60

SPY:

1.36

Calmar Ratio

GRMN:

2.68

SPY:

2.98

Martin Ratio

GRMN:

17.70

SPY:

12.44

Ulcer Index

GRMN:

4.22%

SPY:

2.02%

Daily Std Dev

GRMN:

34.07%

SPY:

12.89%

Max Drawdown

GRMN:

-87.71%

SPY:

-55.19%

Current Drawdown

GRMN:

-2.32%

SPY:

-1.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRMN achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 2.27% return. Over the past 10 years, GRMN has outperformed SPY with an annualized return of 18.95%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively lower 13.64% annualized return.


GRMN

YTD

4.19%

1M

2.65%

6M

22.65%

1Y

75.28%

5Y*

19.46%

10Y*

18.95%

SPY

YTD

2.27%

1M

0.73%

6M

10.73%

1Y

24.55%

5Y*

14.69%

10Y*

13.64%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GRMN vs. SPY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRMN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GRMN is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GRMN is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GRMN is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GRMN is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GRMN is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GRMN is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SPY is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SPY is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SPY is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SPY is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SPY is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SPY is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GRMN vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GRMN, currently valued at 2.20, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.002.201.95
The chart of Sortino ratio for GRMN, currently valued at 4.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.242.60
The chart of Omega ratio for GRMN, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.601.36
The chart of Calmar ratio for GRMN, currently valued at 2.68, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.682.98
The chart of Martin ratio for GRMN, currently valued at 17.70, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0017.7012.44
GRMN
SPY

The current GRMN Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRMN and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.20
1.95
GRMN
SPY

Dividends

GRMN vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

GRMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than SPY's 1.18% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GRMN
Garmin Ltd.
1.39%1.44%2.27%3.89%1.92%2.01%2.30%3.32%3.42%4.21%5.41%3.58%
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%1.87%

Drawdowns

GRMN vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRMN drawdown since its inception was -87.71%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRMN and SPY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-2.32%
-1.70%
GRMN
SPY

Volatility

GRMN vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) is 3.80%, while SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that GRMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.80%
4.26%
GRMN
SPY
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab