GRMN vs. ARW

In the year-to-date period, GRMN achieves a 63.23% return, which is significantly higher than ARW's -5.28% return. Over the past 10 years, GRMN has outperformed ARW with an annualized return of 18.13%, while ARW has yielded a comparatively lower 7.26% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) and Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GRMN Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the ARW Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRMN and ARW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GRMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while ARW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum GRMN drawdown since its inception was -87.71%, which is greater than ARW's maximum drawdown of -81.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRMN and ARW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) is 5.31%, while Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that GRMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Garmin Ltd. and Arrow Electronics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.