PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GRMN vs. ARW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GRMNARW
YTD Return68.46%-4.93%
1Y Return86.98%-2.48%
3Y Return (Ann)17.28%-2.38%
5Y Return (Ann)20.09%7.78%
10Y Return (Ann)18.04%7.33%
Sharpe Ratio2.58-0.14
Sortino Ratio4.82-0.01
Omega Ratio1.721.00
Calmar Ratio2.83-0.14
Martin Ratio20.54-0.61
Ulcer Index4.22%5.87%
Daily Std Dev33.62%25.97%
Max Drawdown-87.71%-81.26%
Current Drawdown0.00%-20.42%

Fundamentals


GRMNARW
Market Cap$40.82B$6.31B
EPS$7.86$8.98
PE Ratio27.0413.37
PEG Ratio3.120.88
Total Revenue (TTM)$5.96B$34.53B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.48B$3.40B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.58B$1.06B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between GRMN and ARW is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GRMN vs. ARW - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GRMN achieves a 68.46% return, which is significantly higher than ARW's -4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, GRMN has outperformed ARW with an annualized return of 18.04%, while ARW has yielded a comparatively lower 7.33% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
26.82%
-9.91%
GRMN
ARW

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GRMN vs. ARW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) and Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRMN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GRMN, currently valued at 2.58, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.58
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GRMN, currently valued at 4.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GRMN, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.72
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GRMN, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.83
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GRMN, currently valued at 20.54, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0020.54
ARW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ARW, currently valued at -0.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ARW, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.01
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ARW, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ARW, currently valued at -0.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.14
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ARW, currently valued at -0.61, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.61

GRMN vs. ARW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRMN Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the ARW Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRMN and ARW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.58
-0.14
GRMN
ARW

Dividends

GRMN vs. ARW - Dividend Comparison

GRMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, while ARW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GRMN
Garmin Ltd.
1.39%2.27%3.10%1.92%2.01%2.30%3.32%3.42%4.21%5.41%3.58%3.90%
ARW
Arrow Electronics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GRMN vs. ARW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRMN drawdown since its inception was -87.71%, which is greater than ARW's maximum drawdown of -81.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRMN and ARW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-20.42%
GRMN
ARW

Volatility

GRMN vs. ARW - Volatility Comparison

Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) has a higher volatility of 21.64% compared to Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW) at 14.96%. This indicates that GRMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
21.64%
14.96%
GRMN
ARW

Financials

GRMN vs. ARW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Garmin Ltd. and Arrow Electronics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items