PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRID vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRID vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 23.80% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 12.02% return. Over the past 10 years, GRID has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 19.34%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.14% annualized return.


GRID

1D
0.94%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
23.80%
6M
23.19%
1Y
44.25%
3Y*
24.20%
5Y*
16.92%
10Y*
19.34%

VEA

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.95%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRID vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
23.80%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.02%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between GRID and VEA is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2009

0.73

The correlation between GRID and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GRID vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GRID
VEA

Industrials

65.2%
19.2%

Utilities

20.4%
3.3%

Technology

11.0%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
7.5%

Basic Materials

0.0%
7.5%

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.6%

Energy

-

5.4%

Financial Services

-

23.3%

Healthcare

-

8.2%

Real Estate

-

2.7%

Industrials

GRID
65.2%
VEA
19.2%

Utilities

GRID
20.4%
VEA
3.3%

Technology

GRID
11.0%
VEA
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GRID
3.5%
VEA
7.5%

Basic Materials

GRID
0.0%
VEA
7.5%

Communication Services

GRID

-

VEA
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

GRID

-

VEA
5.6%

Energy

GRID

-

VEA
5.4%

Financial Services

GRID

-

VEA
23.3%

Healthcare

GRID

-

VEA
8.2%

Real Estate

GRID

-

VEA
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRID vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRID vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRIDVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

2.42

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.15

9.39

+4.77

GRID vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRID Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRID and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRIDVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.75

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.55

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.59

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.24

+0.32

Drawdowns

GRID vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRIDVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-60.68%

+20.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-11.63%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-13.45%

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-29.71%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-35.73%

-4.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.25%

-3.40%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.43%

-13.29%

+4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

3.00%

+0.14%

Volatility

GRID vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a higher volatility of 8.65% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 6.03%. This indicates that GRID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRIDVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.65%

6.03%

+2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.87%

13.91%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.03%

16.15%

+3.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.11%

16.63%

+4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.86%

17.40%

+5.46%

GRID vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRID vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than VEA's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.69%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRID and VEA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (8.65%) compared to VEA (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 19.34% vs 10.14% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 19.34% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.80% for GRID.

GRID is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.03% for VEA.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRID and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer