PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRID vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRID vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 20.61% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -31.90% return.


GRID

1D
1.27%
1M
-2.41%
6M
17.89%
YTD
20.61%
1Y
33.47%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
16.00%
10Y*
18.80%

MSTZ

1D
-11.25%
1M
29.92%
6M
-7.52%
YTD
-31.90%
1Y
266.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRID vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GRID and MSTZ is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024

-0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRID vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRID vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRIDMSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.16

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.17

6.14

+3.03

GRID vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRID Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRID and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRID vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRIDMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-99.38%

+58.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-84.89%

+73.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.68%

-97.68%

+90.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-94.54%

+86.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

43.66%

-40.00%

Volatility

GRID vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) is 8.62%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 57.19%. This indicates that GRID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRIDMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.62%

57.19%

-48.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.14%

135.18%

-116.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.99%

148.74%

-126.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

171.04%

-149.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.70%

171.04%

-148.34%

GRID vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRID vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.78%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRID and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (57.19%) compared to GRID (8.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 266.72% vs 33.47% for GRID. On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, GRID has been the lower-risk option at 8.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 266.72% return vs 33.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

GRID is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 1.05% for MSTZ.

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRID and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer