GRID vs. IMMR
GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while IMMR (Immersion Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GRID returned 19.34%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for IMMR. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRID vs. IMMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 23.80% return, which is significantly higher than IMMR's 0.39% return. Over the past 10 years, GRID has outperformed IMMR with an annualized return of 19.34%, while IMMR has yielded a comparatively lower 1.41% annualized return.
GRID
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- 23.80%
- 6M
- 23.19%
- 1Y
- 44.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.20%
- 5Y*
- 16.92%
- 10Y*
- 19.34%
IMMR
- 1D
- 4.71%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- -3.03%
- 1Y
- -10.21%
- 3Y*
- -2.01%
- 5Y*
- -3.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.41%
GRID vs. IMMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 23.80% | 29.65% | 15.18% | 21.57% | -13.89% | 27.65% | 48.84% | 42.80% | -22.69% | 27.44% |
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 0.39% | -18.30% | 26.47% | 3.43% | 23.12% | -49.42% | 51.95% | -17.08% | 26.91% | -33.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRID and IMMR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2009 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRID vs. IMMR — Risk / Return Rank
GRID
IMMR
GRID vs. IMMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRID | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.99 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | -0.33 | +4.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.15 | -0.61 | +14.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRID | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | -0.26 | +2.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | -0.08 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.03 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | -0.04 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
GRID vs. IMMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum IMMR drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and IMMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRID | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -98.66% | +58.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -30.86% | +19.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -56.90% | +36.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -56.90% | +27.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.56% | -74.29% | +33.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.25% | -89.65% | +84.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.43% | -88.21% | +79.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 16.77% | -13.63% |
Volatility
GRID vs. IMMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) is 8.65%, while Immersion Corporation (IMMR) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that GRID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRID | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.65% | 12.61% | -3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.87% | 27.21% | -10.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.03% | 39.79% | -19.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 45.83% | -24.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.86% | 51.32% | -28.46% |
Dividends
GRID vs. IMMR - Dividend Comparison
GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than IMMR's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 0.80% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 3.60% | 5.59% | 2.06% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRID and IMMR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMMR has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to GRID (8.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs IMMR's -98.66%.
GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRID and IMMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer