GREK vs. FLKR
GREK (Global X MSCI Greece ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GREK is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GREK returned 23.55%/yr vs 16.65%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GREK charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.
Performance
GREK vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GREK achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 86.43% return.
GREK
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 6M
- 11.07%
- 1Y
- 36.15%
- 3Y*
- 31.41%
- 5Y*
- 23.55%
- 10Y*
- 14.76%
FLKR
- 1D
- 6.28%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- 86.43%
- 6M
- 95.63%
- 1Y
- 177.77%
- 3Y*
- 43.23%
- 5Y*
- 16.65%
- 10Y*
- —
GREK vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 10.53% | 76.11% | 9.53% | 42.72% | 3.64% | 6.14% | -13.89% | 50.20% | -31.25% | 12.79% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 86.43% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -21.30% | 2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between GREK and FLKR is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.47 |
GREK vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GREK
FLKR
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
GREK
FLKR
Industrials
GREK
FLKR
Utilities
GREK
FLKR
Consumer Cyclical
GREK
FLKR
Energy
GREK
FLKR
Communication Services
GREK
FLKR
Basic Materials
GREK
FLKR
Consumer Defensive
GREK
FLKR
Real Estate
GREK
FLKR
-
Healthcare
GREK
-
FLKR
Technology
GREK
-
FLKR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GREK vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
GREK
FLKR
GREK vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GREK | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.57 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 7.77 | -6.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | 27.92 | -22.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GREK | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 4.03 | -2.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 0.57 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.47 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
GREK vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GREK drawdown since its inception was -79.50%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREK and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GREK | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.50% | -50.06% | -29.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.32% | -23.03% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.63% | -26.39% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.46% | -49.51% | +19.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -14.59% | +8.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.30% | -22.06% | -23.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.88% | 6.40% | +0.48% |
Volatility
GREK vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) is 8.07%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 26.26%. This indicates that GREK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GREK | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.07% | 26.26% | -18.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.47% | 40.64% | -20.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.14% | 44.43% | -20.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.41% | 29.12% | -4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 28.11% | +1.73% |
GREK vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GREK has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GREK vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
GREK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than FLKR's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 2.07% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 3.13% | 3.46% | 4.63% | 2.61% | 2.82% | 2.16% | 2.62% | 2.25% | 2.41% | 2.13% | 1.95% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GREK and FLKR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (26.26%) compared to GREK (8.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GREK dropped -79.50% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
On 5-year performance, GREK leads with 23.55% vs 16.65% for FLKR. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GREK has been the lower-risk option at 8.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GREK has performed better with a 23.55% return vs 16.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for GREK.
GREK has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.07% for FLKR.
GREK is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. GREK tracks MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for GREK and 0.09% for FLKR.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.03 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GREK and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer