PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GREK vs. FLKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GREK vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GREK achieves a 14.15% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 67.20% return.


GREK

1D
0.11%
1M
-2.53%
6M
7.43%
YTD
14.15%
1Y
25.52%
3Y*
27.97%
5Y*
27.03%
10Y*
16.17%
ALL TIME*
5.76%

FLKR

1D
0.49%
1M
-25.25%
6M
45.78%
YTD
67.20%
1Y
125.99%
3Y*
38.49%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GREK vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GREK
Global X MSCI Greece ETF
14.15%76.11%9.53%42.72%3.64%6.14%-13.89%50.20%-31.25%11.83%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
67.20%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GREK and FLKR is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.47

The correlation between GREK and FLKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

GREK vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GREK
FLKR

Financial Services

48.8%
12.3%

Utilities

14.3%
0.4%

Industrials

12.5%
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
7.2%

Energy

6.8%
0.6%

Communication Services

4.1%
1.8%

Basic Materials

3.0%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
2.1%

Healthcare

-

3.3%

Technology

-

53.7%

Financial Services

GREK
48.8%
FLKR
12.3%

Utilities

GREK
14.3%
FLKR
0.4%

Industrials

GREK
12.5%
FLKR
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GREK
8.7%
FLKR
7.2%

Energy

GREK
6.8%
FLKR
0.6%

Communication Services

GREK
4.1%
FLKR
1.8%

Basic Materials

GREK
3.0%
FLKR
2.8%

Real Estate

GREK
1.0%
FLKR

-

Consumer Defensive

GREK
1.0%
FLKR
2.1%

Healthcare

GREK

-

FLKR
3.3%

Technology

GREK

-

FLKR
53.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GREK vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GREK
GREK Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GREK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GREK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GREK Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GREK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
GREK Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GREK vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GREKFLKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.40

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

4.84

-3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.69

15.43

-11.74

GREK vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GREK Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GREK and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GREK vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GREK drawdown since its inception was -79.50%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREK and FLKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GREKFLKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.50%

-50.06%

-29.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.32%

-26.19%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.63%

-26.39%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.46%

-47.97%

+17.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.93%

-25.83%

+20.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.97%

-21.94%

-23.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.93%

8.20%

-1.27%

Volatility

GREK vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) is 5.98%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 22.88%. This indicates that GREK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GREKFLKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

22.88%

-16.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.10%

48.04%

-26.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.36%

51.00%

-26.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.39%

31.34%

-6.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.85%

29.32%

-0.47%

GREK vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GREK has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GREK vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

GREK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than FLKR's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
2.76%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%0.00%0.00%
GREK
Global X MSCI Greece ETF
2.61%3.46%4.63%2.61%2.82%2.16%2.62%2.25%2.41%2.13%1.95%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


GREK and FLKR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (22.88%) compared to GREK (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GREK dropped -79.50% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

On 5-year performance, GREK leads with 27.03% vs 14.68% for FLKR. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GREK has been the lower-risk option at 5.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GREK has performed better with a 27.03% return vs 14.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for GREK.

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 2.61% for GREK.

GREK is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FLKR is South Korea Equities. GREK tracks MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for GREK and 0.09% for FLKR.

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GREK and FLKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer