PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GREK vs. EWQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GREK vs. EWQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GREK achieves a 22.60% return, which is significantly higher than EWQ's 5.94% return. Over the past 10 years, GREK has outperformed EWQ with an annualized return of 17.36%, while EWQ has yielded a comparatively lower 9.96% annualized return.


GREK

1D
-0.62%
1M
5.48%
6M
9.57%
YTD
22.60%
1Y
36.74%
3Y*
32.40%
5Y*
27.82%
10Y*
17.36%
ALL TIME*
6.26%

EWQ

1D
0.17%
1M
1.37%
6M
5.10%
YTD
5.94%
1Y
15.63%
3Y*
9.54%
5Y*
7.52%
10Y*
9.96%
ALL TIME*
6.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$12.00M$12.69M$15.52M
$9.46M$9.35M$7.83M

GREK vs. EWQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GREK
Global X MSCI Greece ETF
22.60%76.11%9.53%42.72%3.64%6.14%-13.89%50.20%-31.25%34.80%
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
5.94%28.90%-5.63%21.71%-12.05%21.43%2.86%26.69%-12.90%29.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GREK and EWQ is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2011

0.56

The correlation between GREK and EWQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

GREK vs. EWQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GREK
EWQ

Financial Services

48.8%
13.4%

Utilities

14.3%
2.6%

Industrials

12.5%
33.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
11.4%

Energy

6.8%
7.2%

Communication Services

4.1%
2.8%

Basic Materials

3.0%
7.1%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
8.5%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Technology

-

4.0%

Financial Services

GREK
48.8%
EWQ
13.4%

Utilities

GREK
14.3%
EWQ
2.6%

Industrials

GREK
12.5%
EWQ
33.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GREK
8.7%
EWQ
11.4%

Energy

GREK
6.8%
EWQ
7.2%

Communication Services

GREK
4.1%
EWQ
2.8%

Basic Materials

GREK
3.0%
EWQ
7.1%

Real Estate

GREK
1.0%
EWQ
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

GREK
1.0%
EWQ
8.5%

Healthcare

GREK

-

EWQ
8.5%

Technology

GREK

-

EWQ
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GREK vs. EWQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GREK
GREK Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GREK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GREK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GREK Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GREK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GREK Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

EWQ
EWQ Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
EWQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EWQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GREK vs. EWQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GREKEWQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.15

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.04

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.27

3.10

+2.16

GREK vs. EWQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GREK Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the EWQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GREK and EWQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GREK vs. EWQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GREK drawdown since its inception was -79.50%, which is greater than EWQ's maximum drawdown of -61.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREK and EWQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GREKEWQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.50%

-61.41%

-18.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.32%

-13.80%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.32%

-15.16%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.46%

-31.46%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.04%

-39.23%

-17.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-1.42%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.86%

-16.01%

-28.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.92%

4.59%

+2.33%

Volatility

GREK vs. EWQ - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) at 4.68%. This indicates that GREK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GREKEWQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.63%

4.68%

+2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.24%

14.69%

+6.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.67%

17.42%

+7.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.49%

19.85%

+4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.85%

20.39%

+8.46%

GREK vs. EWQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GREK has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than EWQ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GREK vs. EWQ - Dividend Comparison

GREK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than EWQ's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
2.83%2.63%3.31%2.73%3.23%3.79%1.02%2.44%2.90%1.90%2.84%2.25%
GREK
Global X MSCI Greece ETF
2.43%3.46%4.63%2.61%2.82%2.16%2.62%2.25%2.41%2.13%1.95%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


GREK and EWQ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GREK has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to EWQ (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GREK dropped -79.50% vs EWQ's -61.41%.

On 10-year performance, GREK leads with 17.36% vs 9.96% for EWQ. On fees, EWQ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GREK has performed better with a 17.36% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWQ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for GREK.

EWQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.43% for GREK.

GREK is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EWQ is Europe Equities. GREK tracks MSCI All Greece Select 25/50 Index, while EWQ tracks MSCI France Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for GREK and 0.50% for EWQ.

GREK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GREK and EWQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer