GREK vs. EFAS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

GREK (Global X MSCI Greece ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GREK is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while EFAS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GREK returned 24.30%/yr vs 12.41%/yr for EFAS. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GREK charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

GREK vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with GREK at 15.45% and EFAS at 15.45%.

GREK

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 4.95%
• YTD: 15.45%
• 6M: 15.54%
• 1Y: 40.83%
• 3Y*: 32.67%
• 5Y*: 24.30%
• 10Y*: 16.01%

EFAS

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 15.45%
• 6M: 18.87%
• 1Y: 29.12%
• 3Y*: 25.18%
• 5Y*: 12.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GREK vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF	15.45%	76.11%	9.53%	42.72%	3.64%	6.14%	-13.89%	50.20%	-31.25%	34.80%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	15.45%	46.83%	3.07%	14.65%	-8.00%	12.75%	-5.42%	14.60%	-11.60%	22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between GREK and EFAS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2016	0.50

The correlation between GREK and EFAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GREK vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GREK	EFAS
Financial Services	47.1%	30.1%
Industrials	13.5%	9.9%
Utilities	11.6%	14.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	1.9%
Energy	8.4%	13.7%
Communication Services	4.6%	8.6%
Basic Materials	3.2%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	8.1%
Real Estate	1.0%	11.3%
Healthcare	-	0.1%
Technology	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

GREK vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GREK

GREK Risk / Return Rank: 49
GREK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
GREK Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
GREK Omega Ratio Rank: 51
GREK Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GREK Martin Ratio Rank: 40

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 89
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GREK vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GREK	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	2.75	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	3.86	-1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.48	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	5.64	-3.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.62	14.75	-9.13

GREK vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GREK Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GREK and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GREK vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GREK drawdown since its inception was -79.50%, which is greater than EFAS's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREK and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GREK	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.50%	-44.38%	-35.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.32%	-5.30%	-16.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.63%	-11.84%	-10.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.46%	-28.81%	-1.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-0.87%	-0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.25%	-7.06%	-38.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.90%	2.02%	+4.88%

Volatility

GREK vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 3.35%. This indicates that GREK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GREK	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.69%	3.35%	+5.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.65%	8.58%	+12.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.35%	10.87%	+13.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.44%	15.62%	+8.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.71%	18.32%	+11.39%

GREK vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GREK has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

GREK vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

GREK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than EFAS's 4.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.62%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%	0.00%
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF	3.00%	3.46%	4.63%	2.61%	2.82%	2.16%	2.62%	2.25%	2.41%	2.13%	1.95%	1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GREK and EFAS in my portfolio?

GREK and EFAS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GREK or EFAS?

GREK has higher volatility (8.69%) compared to EFAS (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GREK dropped -79.50% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

Which ETF is better, GREK or EFAS?

On 5-year performance, GREK leads with 24.30% vs 12.41% for EFAS. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GREK or EFAS?

Over the 5-year period, GREK has performed better with a 24.30% return vs 12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GREK or EFAS?

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for GREK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GREK or EFAS?

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 3.00% for GREK.

What is the main difference between GREK and EFAS?

GREK is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EFAS is Foreign Large Cap Equities. GREK tracks MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for GREK and 0.56% for EFAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.