GQQQ vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GQQQ (Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GQQQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

GQQQ vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQQQ achieves a 17.85% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 49.84% return.

GQQQ

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 17.85%
• 6M: 16.10%
• 1Y: 33.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: -4.72%
• 1M: -14.61%
• YTD: 49.84%
• 6M: 38.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQQQ vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF	17.85%	1.30%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	49.84%	-38.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GQQQ and MEME is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025	0.66

Return for Risk

GQQQ vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQQQ

GQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 70
GQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
GQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
GQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 67
GQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 78

MEME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQQQ vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GQQQ	MEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.19	—	—

Drawdowns

GQQQ vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQQQ drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQQQ and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQQQ	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.36%	-48.78%	+26.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.44%	-21.27%	+17.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.10%	-28.59%	+25.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GQQQ	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.89%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.16%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.19%	75.53%	-58.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.69%	75.53%	-54.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.69%	75.53%	-54.84%

GQQQ vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQQQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

GQQQ vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

GQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF	0.41%	0.46%	0.11%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GQQQ and MEME in my portfolio?

GQQQ and MEME have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GQQQ or MEME?

On fees, GQQQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GQQQ or MEME?

GQQQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GQQQ or MEME?

GQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

What is the main difference between GQQQ and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: Astoria and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GQQQ and 0.69% for MEME.