GQQQ vs. FITZ
GQQQ (Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GQQQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.
Performance
GQQQ vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GQQQ
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 6.40%
- YTD
- 21.09%
- 6M
- 20.15%
- 1Y
- 40.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GQQQ vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF | 0.38% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GQQQ and FITZ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GQQQ vs. FITZ — Risk / Return Rank
GQQQ
FITZ
GQQQ vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GQQQ | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQQQ | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | -7.29 | +8.55 |
Drawdowns
GQQQ vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQQQ drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -1.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQQQ and FITZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQQQ | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.36% | -1.97% | -20.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -1.97% | +1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -1.08% | -2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | — | — |
Volatility
GQQQ vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GQQQ | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.65% | 8.74% | +6.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 8.74% | +11.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 8.74% | +11.46% |
GQQQ vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQQQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GQQQ vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison
GQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GQQQ and FITZ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GQQQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GQQQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.
GQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.
They also come from different issuers: Astoria and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GQQQ and 0.75% for FITZ.
Find the right allocation for GQQQ and FITZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer