GPZ vs. UGA

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

GPZ (VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund, LP) are both exchange-traded funds - GPZ is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Near-Month NYMEX RBOB Gasoline Futures Contract. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GPZ returned -11.31% vs 71.49% for UGA. Their -0.22 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GPZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for UGA.

Performance

GPZ vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) and United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPZ achieves a -8.80% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 72.77% return.

GPZ

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 10.59%
• 6M: -1.00%
• YTD: -8.80%
• 1Y: -11.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -0.32%

UGA

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: 54.03%
• YTD: 72.77%
• 1Y: 71.49%
• 3Y*: 14.87%
• 5Y*: 24.07%
• 10Y*: 16.28%
• ALL TIME*: 4.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GPZ VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF	$4.53M	$3.62M	$4.26M
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP	$8.67M	$6.11M	$4.99M

GPZ vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GPZ VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF	-8.80%	9.24%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP	72.77%	5.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GPZ and UGA is -0.23, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	-0.22

Return for Risk

GPZ vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GPZ

GPZ Risk / Return Rank: 6
GPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
GPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
GPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6
GPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
GPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 72
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GPZ vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) and United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GPZ	UGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.40	1.96	-2.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.39	2.47	-2.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.32	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.36	3.54	-3.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.64	9.75	-10.39

GPZ vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPZ and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GPZ vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPZ drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPZ and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPZ	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.72%	-86.59%	+54.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.72%	-20.32%	-11.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.22%	-14.67%	-1.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.44%	-36.52%	+23.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.81%	7.36%	+10.45%

Volatility

GPZ vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) is 7.91%, while United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA) has a volatility of 13.00%. This indicates that GPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPZ	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.91%	13.00%	-5.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.04%	32.16%	-10.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.08%	36.60%	-8.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.60%	34.71%	-7.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.60%	37.31%	-9.71%

GPZ vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPZ vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

GPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GPZ VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF	0.91%	0.83%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPZ and UGA in my portfolio?

GPZ and UGA have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GPZ or UGA?

UGA has higher volatility (13.00%) compared to GPZ (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPZ dropped -31.72% vs UGA's -86.59%.

Which ETF is better, GPZ or UGA?

On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 71.49% vs -11.31% for GPZ. On fees, GPZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GPZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GPZ or UGA?

Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 71.49% return vs -11.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GPZ or UGA?

GPZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for UGA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GPZ or UGA?

GPZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

What is the main difference between GPZ and UGA?

GPZ is categorized as Financials Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. GPZ tracks MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index, while UGA tracks Near-Month NYMEX RBOB Gasoline Futures Contract. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GPZ and 1.02% for UGA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.