PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPTUX vs. GPTCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPTUX vs. GPTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) and GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPTUX achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly higher than GPTCX's 5.00% return. Over the past 10 years, GPTUX has outperformed GPTCX with an annualized return of 8.94%, while GPTCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.87% annualized return.


GPTUX

1D
1.52%
1M
-0.85%
6M
4.63%
YTD
5.98%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
11.64%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
8.94%
ALL TIME*
7.52%

GPTCX

1D
0.64%
1M
-0.24%
6M
3.19%
YTD
5.00%
1Y
11.23%
3Y*
9.75%
5Y*
4.84%
10Y*
5.87%
ALL TIME*
5.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GPTUX vs. GPTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPTUX
GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund
5.98%7.08%20.29%14.85%-6.15%19.72%-3.42%20.50%-4.54%18.93%
GPTCX
GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund
5.00%12.54%8.12%10.64%-12.41%9.37%8.47%16.21%-4.80%11.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GPTUX and GPTCX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.86

The correlation between GPTUX and GPTCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPTUX vs. GPTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GPTUX
GPTUX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GPTUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPTUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPTUX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GPTUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPTUX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GPTCX
GPTCX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GPTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GPTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GPTUX vs. GPTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) and GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPTUXGPTCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.31

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

2.08

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.87

9.02

-3.15

GPTUX vs. GPTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPTUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the GPTCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPTUX and GPTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPTUX vs. GPTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPTUX drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, which is greater than GPTCX's maximum drawdown of -20.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTUX and GPTCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPTUXGPTCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.84%

-20.89%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-5.14%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.31%

-7.08%

-9.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.31%

-20.89%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.84%

-20.89%

-1.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-0.55%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-3.92%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

1.19%

+1.04%

Volatility

GPTUX vs. GPTCX - Volatility Comparison

GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX) at 1.59%. This indicates that GPTUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPTUXGPTCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

1.59%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

5.38%

+4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.12%

6.44%

+6.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.06%

8.32%

+4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.94%

8.44%

+4.50%

GPTUX vs. GPTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPTUX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GPTCX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPTUX vs. GPTCX - Dividend Comparison

GPTUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.90%, more than GPTCX's 3.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPTCX
GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund
3.63%3.82%3.07%3.20%2.18%3.46%2.07%2.11%1.87%1.65%10.91%10.01%
GPTUX
GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund
7.90%8.37%6.41%1.24%4.81%10.27%4.82%4.34%4.68%3.43%1.05%1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPTUX and GPTCX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPTUX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to GPTCX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPTUX dropped -22.84% vs GPTCX's -20.89%.

GPTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPTUX and GPTCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer