GPTCX vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
GPTCX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Apr 28, 2011. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Performance
GPTCX vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GPTCX vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPTCX GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund | -0.08% | 12.54% | 8.12% | 10.64% | -12.41% | 9.37% | 8.47% | 16.21% | -4.80% | 11.52% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -8.97% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPTCX achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's -8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, GPTCX has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 5.81%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.75% annualized return.
GPTCX
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 10.25%
- 3Y*
- 9.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.67%
- 10Y*
- 5.81%
VONG
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- YTD
- -8.97%
- 6M
- -8.47%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPTCX vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPTCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GPTCX vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
GPTCX
VONG
GPTCX vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPTCX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 0.84 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.92 | 1.36 | +0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.19 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.22 | +0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 4.16 | +3.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPTCX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 0.84 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.59 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.81 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.84 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between GPTCX and VONG is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GPTCX vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
GPTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than VONG's 0.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPTCX GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund | 3.82% | 3.82% | 3.07% | 3.20% | 2.18% | 3.46% | 2.07% | 2.11% | 1.87% | 1.65% | 10.91% | 10.01% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
GPTCX vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPTCX drawdown since its inception was -20.89%, smaller than the maximum VONG drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTCX and VONG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPTCX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.89% | -32.72% | +11.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -16.23% | +10.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.89% | -32.72% | +11.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.89% | -32.72% | +11.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -12.29% | +8.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -4.90% | +0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.36% | 4.78% | -3.42% |
Volatility
GPTCX vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX) is 3.13%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that GPTCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPTCX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 6.81% | -3.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.61% | 12.37% | -7.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.83% | 22.42% | -14.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.22% | 21.35% | -13.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.41% | 20.82% | -12.41% |