GPTCX vs. SMH

In the year-to-date period, GPTCX achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly higher than SMH's -1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, GPTCX has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 4.02%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 24.75% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GPTCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GPTCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPTCX and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GPTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than SMH's 0.45% yield.

The maximum GPTCX drawdown since its inception was -19.79%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -83.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTCX and SMH.

The current volatility for GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX) is 1.86%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 9.05%. This indicates that GPTCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.