GPTCX vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
GPTCX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Apr 28, 2011. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GPTCX or SMH.
Correlation
The correlation between GPTCX and SMH is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GPTCX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GPTCX:
2.01
SMH:
0.74
GPTCX:
2.81
SMH:
1.16
GPTCX:
1.38
SMH:
1.15
GPTCX:
2.37
SMH:
1.07
GPTCX:
10.66
SMH:
2.46
GPTCX:
1.12%
SMH:
10.79%
GPTCX:
5.93%
SMH:
36.29%
GPTCX:
-25.07%
SMH:
-83.29%
GPTCX:
0.00%
SMH:
-8.50%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPTCX achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 5.80% return. Over the past 10 years, GPTCX has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 1.81%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 26.10% annualized return.
GPTCX
3.22%
2.11%
3.49%
11.49%
4.27%
1.81%
SMH
5.80%
-0.79%
3.75%
27.56%
28.88%
26.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPTCX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPTCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GPTCX vs. SMH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GPTCX
SMH
GPTCX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GPTCX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
GPTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than SMH's 0.42% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPTCX GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund | 2.97% | 3.06% | 3.20% | 1.78% | 1.76% | 1.74% | 2.11% | 1.70% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 1.40% |
SMH VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF | 0.42% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
GPTCX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPTCX drawdown since its inception was -25.07%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -83.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTCX and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GPTCX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX) is 1.54%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 12.66%. This indicates that GPTCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.