GPTCX vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
GPTCX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Apr 28, 2011. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.
Performance
GPTCX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GPTCX vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPTCX GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund | -0.08% | 12.54% | 8.12% | 10.64% | -12.41% | 9.37% | 8.47% | 16.21% | -4.80% | 11.52% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 8.84% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPTCX achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 8.84% return. Over the past 10 years, GPTCX has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 5.81%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 31.58% annualized return.
GPTCX
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 10.25%
- 3Y*
- 9.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.67%
- 10Y*
- 5.81%
SMH
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 85.04%
- 3Y*
- 44.53%
- 5Y*
- 26.15%
- 10Y*
- 31.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPTCX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPTCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GPTCX vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
GPTCX
SMH
GPTCX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPTCX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 2.32 | -0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.92 | 2.92 | -1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.41 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 5.39 | -3.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 19.22 | -11.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPTCX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 2.32 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.76 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.98 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.28 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between GPTCX and SMH is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GPTCX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
GPTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than SMH's 0.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPTCX GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund | 3.82% | 3.82% | 3.07% | 3.20% | 2.18% | 3.46% | 2.07% | 2.11% | 1.87% | 1.65% | 10.91% | 10.01% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.28% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
GPTCX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPTCX drawdown since its inception was -20.89%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTCX and SMH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPTCX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.89% | -84.96% | +64.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -15.95% | +9.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.89% | -45.30% | +24.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.89% | -45.30% | +24.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -8.02% | +4.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -41.35% | +37.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.36% | 4.47% | -3.11% |
Volatility
GPTCX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX) is 3.13%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.74%. This indicates that GPTCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPTCX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 11.74% | -8.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.61% | 24.02% | -19.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.83% | 36.88% | -29.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.22% | 34.68% | -26.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.41% | 32.29% | -23.88% |