GPTUX vs. GMWEX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) and GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX).
GPTUX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Apr 28, 2011. GMWEX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Jun 29, 2001.
Performance
GPTUX vs. GMWEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GPTUX vs. GMWEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPTUX GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund | -3.40% | 7.08% | 20.29% | 14.85% | -6.15% | 19.72% | -3.42% | 20.50% | -4.54% | 18.93% |
GMWEX GuideMark World ex-US Fund | 0.99% | 33.60% | 5.36% | 15.97% | -16.19% | 11.70% | 8.58% | 20.02% | -14.12% | 25.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPTUX achieves a -3.40% return, which is significantly lower than GMWEX's 0.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GPTUX having a 8.23% annualized return and GMWEX not far ahead at 8.37%.
GPTUX
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- -3.40%
- 6M
- -3.29%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.10%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
GMWEX
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 5.74%
- 1Y
- 24.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPTUX vs. GMWEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPTUX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than GMWEX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GPTUX vs. GMWEX — Risk / Return Rank
GPTUX
GMWEX
GPTUX vs. GMWEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) and GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPTUX | GMWEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 1.53 | -0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.84 | 2.09 | -1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.31 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 2.31 | -1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.12 | 8.99 | -5.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPTUX | GMWEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 1.53 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.52 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.52 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.14 | +0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between GPTUX and GMWEX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GPTUX vs. GMWEX - Dividend Comparison
GPTUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, less than GMWEX's 14.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPTUX GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund | 8.67% | 8.37% | 6.41% | 1.24% | 4.81% | 10.27% | 4.82% | 4.34% | 4.68% | 3.43% | 1.05% | 1.05% |
GMWEX GuideMark World ex-US Fund | 14.50% | 14.64% | 2.94% | 3.43% | 3.11% | 1.08% | 2.01% | 1.66% | 1.61% | 1.43% | 1.86% | 2.70% |
Drawdowns
GPTUX vs. GMWEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPTUX drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, smaller than the maximum GMWEX drawdown of -70.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTUX and GMWEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPTUX | GMWEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.84% | -70.00% | +47.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -10.42% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.31% | -31.28% | +14.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.84% | -35.51% | +12.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.10% | -6.92% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -31.22% | +26.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 2.68% | -0.16% |
Volatility
GPTUX vs. GMWEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) is 4.73%, while GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that GPTUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMWEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPTUX | GMWEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 7.47% | -2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 10.78% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.31% | 16.48% | -3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.94% | 15.55% | -2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 16.17% | -3.37% |