GPTUX vs. GMLVX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) and GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX).
GPTUX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Apr 28, 2011. GMLVX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Jun 28, 2001.
Performance
GPTUX vs. GMLVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GPTUX vs. GMLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPTUX GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund | -3.40% | 7.08% | 20.29% | 14.85% | -6.15% | 19.72% | -3.42% | 20.50% | -4.54% | 18.93% |
GMLVX GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund | 3.63% | 30.29% | 7.90% | 11.13% | -20.58% | -0.51% | 15.41% | 17.72% | -15.18% | 38.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPTUX achieves a -3.40% return, which is significantly lower than GMLVX's 3.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GPTUX having a 8.23% annualized return and GMLVX not far behind at 7.95%.
GPTUX
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- -3.40%
- 6M
- -3.29%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.10%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
GMLVX
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -9.57%
- YTD
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 7.92%
- 1Y
- 31.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.92%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPTUX vs. GMLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPTUX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than GMLVX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GPTUX vs. GMLVX — Risk / Return Rank
GPTUX
GMLVX
GPTUX vs. GMLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) and GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPTUX | GMLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 1.79 | -1.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.84 | 2.32 | -1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.35 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 2.21 | -1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.12 | 9.14 | -6.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPTUX | GMLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 1.79 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.27 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.46 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.20 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between GPTUX and GMLVX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GPTUX vs. GMLVX - Dividend Comparison
GPTUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, more than GMLVX's 1.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPTUX GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund | 8.67% | 8.37% | 6.41% | 1.24% | 4.81% | 10.27% | 4.82% | 4.34% | 4.68% | 3.43% | 1.05% | 1.05% |
GMLVX GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund | 1.44% | 1.50% | 3.01% | 3.46% | 17.44% | 9.65% | 0.19% | 1.76% | 15.38% | 0.71% | 0.35% | 1.34% |
Drawdowns
GPTUX vs. GMLVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPTUX drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, smaller than the maximum GMLVX drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTUX and GMLVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPTUX | GMLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.84% | -70.50% | +47.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -14.40% | +6.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.31% | -35.37% | +19.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.84% | -39.40% | +16.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.10% | -11.73% | +5.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -18.28% | +13.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 3.48% | -0.96% |
Volatility
GPTUX vs. GMLVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) is 4.73%, while GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that GPTUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPTUX | GMLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 9.86% | -5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 13.99% | -4.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.31% | 18.17% | -4.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.94% | 16.03% | -3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 17.37% | -4.57% |