GMLVX vs. GMLGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GMLVX (GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund) and GMLGX (GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund) are both mutual funds - GMLVX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by GuideMark, while GMLGX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by GuideMark. Over the past 10 years, GMLVX returned 8.41%/yr vs 13.35%/yr for GMLGX. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GMLVX charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for GMLGX.

Performance

GMLVX vs. GMLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) and GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMLVX achieves a 16.84% return, which is significantly higher than GMLGX's 8.46% return. Over the past 10 years, GMLVX has underperformed GMLGX with an annualized return of 8.41%, while GMLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.35% annualized return.

GMLVX

• 1D: 4.11%
• 1M: -2.22%
• 6M: 6.50%
• YTD: 16.84%
• 1Y: 33.55%
• 3Y*: 17.86%
• 5Y*: 7.22%
• 10Y*: 8.41%
• ALL TIME*: 4.47%

GMLGX

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 0.67%
• 6M: 8.19%
• YTD: 8.46%
• 1Y: 19.24%
• 3Y*: 17.02%
• 5Y*: 10.51%
• 10Y*: 13.35%
• ALL TIME*: 7.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GMLGX GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
GMLVX GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

GMLVX vs. GMLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GMLVX GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund	16.84%	30.29%	7.90%	11.13%	-20.58%	-0.51%	15.41%	17.72%	-15.18%	38.23%
GMLGX GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund	8.46%	14.26%	22.35%	25.27%	-19.10%	26.33%	22.21%	28.12%	-5.53%	20.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GMLVX and GMLGX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2002	0.80

The correlation between GMLVX and GMLGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GMLVX vs. GMLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GMLVX

GMLVX Risk / Return Rank: 48
GMLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
GMLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
GMLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
GMLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
GMLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

GMLGX

GMLGX Risk / Return Rank: 50
GMLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
GMLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
GMLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
GMLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
GMLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GMLVX vs. GMLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) and GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GMLVX	GMLGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	1.36	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	1.96	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.24	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	1.78	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.58	7.50	-0.92

GMLVX vs. GMLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMLVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the GMLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMLVX and GMLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GMLVX vs. GMLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMLVX drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, which is greater than GMLGX's maximum drawdown of -56.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMLVX and GMLGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMLVX	GMLGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.50%	-56.56%	-13.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.40%	-9.59%	-4.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.31%	-20.36%	+4.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.48%	-25.54%	-7.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.40%	-35.15%	-4.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.87%	-0.72%	-10.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.10%	-9.39%	-8.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.67%	2.27%	+2.40%

Volatility

GMLVX vs. GMLGX - Volatility Comparison

GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX) at 3.11%. This indicates that GMLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMLVX	GMLGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.09%	3.11%	+6.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.08%	9.56%	+12.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.91%	12.57%	+11.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.77%	17.67%	+0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.13%	18.63%	-0.50%

GMLVX vs. GMLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMLVX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GMLGX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMLVX vs. GMLGX - Dividend Comparison

GMLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than GMLGX's 17.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GMLGX GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund	17.04%	18.49%	4.20%	0.75%	10.27%	3.03%	0.38%	1.01%	2.22%	4.25%	2.99%	3.08%
GMLVX GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund	1.28%	1.50%	3.01%	3.46%	17.44%	9.65%	0.19%	1.76%	15.38%	0.71%	0.35%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMLVX and GMLGX in my portfolio?

GMLVX and GMLGX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMLVX or GMLGX?

GMLVX has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to GMLGX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMLVX dropped -70.50% vs GMLGX's -56.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.