PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMLVX vs. GMLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMLVX vs. GMLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) and GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMLVX achieves a 29.70% return, which is significantly higher than GMLGX's 7.61% return. Over the past 10 years, GMLVX has underperformed GMLGX with an annualized return of 10.46%, while GMLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.65% annualized return.


GMLVX

1D
2.77%
1M
11.54%
YTD
29.70%
6M
32.69%
1Y
56.36%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*
10.46%

GMLGX

1D
0.26%
1M
3.34%
YTD
7.61%
6M
8.35%
1Y
23.79%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
13.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMLVX vs. GMLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMLVX
GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund
29.70%30.29%7.90%11.13%-20.58%-0.51%15.41%17.72%-15.18%38.23%
GMLGX
GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund
7.61%14.26%22.35%25.27%-19.10%26.33%22.21%28.12%-5.53%20.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GMLVX and GMLGX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.80

The correlation between GMLVX and GMLGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMLVX vs. GMLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMLVX
GMLVX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GMLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GMLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

GMLGX
GMLGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GMLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GMLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMLVX vs. GMLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) and GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMLVXGMLGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.09

1.99

+1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.93

2.81

+1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.35

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

2.50

+1.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.82

10.67

+5.15

GMLVX vs. GMLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMLVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the GMLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMLVX and GMLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMLVXGMLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

1.99

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.64

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.73

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.38

-0.13

Drawdowns

GMLVX vs. GMLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMLVX drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, which is greater than GMLGX's maximum drawdown of -56.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMLVX and GMLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMLVXGMLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.50%

-56.56%

-13.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.40%

-9.59%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.31%

-20.36%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.37%

-25.54%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.40%

-35.15%

-4.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.18%

-9.45%

-8.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

2.24%

+1.30%

Volatility

GMLVX vs. GMLGX - Volatility Comparison

GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX) at 2.88%. This indicates that GMLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMLVXGMLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.13%

2.88%

+5.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.27%

8.95%

+7.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.74%

12.19%

+6.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

17.63%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

18.67%

-1.04%

GMLVX vs. GMLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMLVX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GMLGX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMLVX vs. GMLGX - Dividend Comparison

GMLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than GMLGX's 17.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMLGX
GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund
17.18%18.49%4.20%0.75%10.27%3.03%0.38%1.01%2.22%4.25%2.99%3.08%
GMLVX
GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund
1.15%1.50%3.01%3.46%17.44%9.65%0.19%1.76%15.38%0.71%0.35%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMLVX and GMLGX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMLVX has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to GMLGX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMLVX dropped -70.50% vs GMLGX's -56.56%.

GMLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMLVX and GMLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer