PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMLVX vs. GMCOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMLVX vs. GMCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) and GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMLVX achieves a 29.70% return, which is significantly higher than GMCOX's -0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, GMLVX has outperformed GMCOX with an annualized return of 10.46%, while GMCOX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.15% annualized return.


GMLVX

1D
2.77%
1M
11.54%
YTD
29.70%
6M
32.69%
1Y
56.36%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*
10.46%

GMCOX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
-0.14%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
-0.37%
10Y*
1.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMLVX vs. GMCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMLVX
GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund
29.70%30.29%7.90%11.13%-20.58%-0.51%15.41%17.72%-15.18%38.23%
GMCOX
GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund
-0.24%6.56%1.39%6.19%-14.64%-2.01%8.13%8.58%-1.44%2.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GMLVX and GMCOX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

-0.13

The correlation between GMLVX and GMCOX shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMLVX vs. GMCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMLVX
GMLVX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GMLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GMLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

GMCOX
GMCOX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GMCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GMCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMLVX vs. GMCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) and GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMLVXGMCOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.09

1.15

+1.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.93

1.74

+2.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.20

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

1.51

+2.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.82

4.54

+11.28

GMLVX vs. GMCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMLVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the GMCOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMLVX and GMCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMLVXGMCOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

1.15

+1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

-0.06

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.23

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.14

+0.11

Drawdowns

GMLVX vs. GMCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMLVX drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, which is greater than GMCOX's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMLVX and GMCOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMLVXGMCOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.50%

-28.49%

-42.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.40%

-2.96%

-11.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.31%

-6.46%

-9.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.37%

-19.75%

-15.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.40%

-20.36%

-19.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.50%

+4.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.18%

-7.81%

-10.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

0.98%

+2.56%

Volatility

GMLVX vs. GMCOX - Volatility Comparison

GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX) at 1.39%. This indicates that GMLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMCOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMLVXGMCOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.13%

1.39%

+6.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.27%

2.72%

+13.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.74%

3.90%

+14.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

5.94%

+10.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

4.98%

+12.65%

GMLVX vs. GMCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMLVX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GMCOX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMLVX vs. GMCOX - Dividend Comparison

GMLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than GMCOX's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMCOX
GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund
3.54%3.54%3.39%3.40%2.27%2.16%3.49%1.45%2.38%2.35%2.29%2.55%
GMLVX
GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund
1.15%1.50%3.01%3.46%17.44%9.65%0.19%1.76%15.38%0.71%0.35%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMLVX and GMCOX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMLVX has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to GMCOX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMLVX dropped -70.50% vs GMCOX's -28.49%.

GMLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMLVX and GMCOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer