GMLVX vs. GMSMX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) and GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund (GMSMX).
GMLVX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Jun 28, 2001. GMSMX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Jun 29, 2001.
Performance
GMLVX vs. GMSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMLVX vs. GMSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMLVX GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund | 3.63% | 30.29% | 7.90% | 11.13% | -20.58% | -0.51% | 15.41% | 17.72% | -15.18% | 38.23% |
GMSMX GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund | 0.00% | 8.76% | 11.29% | 17.73% | -18.23% | 24.45% | 21.98% | 23.25% | -9.38% | 14.46% |
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, GMLVX has underperformed GMSMX with an annualized return of 7.95%, while GMSMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.
GMLVX
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -9.57%
- YTD
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 7.92%
- 1Y
- 31.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.92%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
GMSMX
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 17.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- 4.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMLVX vs. GMSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMLVX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GMSMX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GMLVX vs. GMSMX — Risk / Return Rank
GMLVX
GMSMX
GMLVX vs. GMSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) and GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund (GMSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMLVX | GMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 0.82 | +0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.32 | 1.30 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.17 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.33 | +0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 5.06 | +4.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMLVX | GMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 0.82 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.22 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.47 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.27 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMLVX and GMSMX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GMLVX vs. GMSMX - Dividend Comparison
GMLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than GMSMX's 6.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMLVX GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund | 1.44% | 1.50% | 3.01% | 3.46% | 17.44% | 9.65% | 0.19% | 1.76% | 15.38% | 0.71% | 0.35% | 1.34% |
GMSMX GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund | 6.91% | 6.91% | 9.08% | 0.67% | 2.29% | 11.71% | 2.06% | 1.43% | 6.72% | 34.90% | 0.28% | 2.83% |
Drawdowns
GMLVX vs. GMSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMLVX drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, roughly equal to the maximum GMSMX drawdown of -70.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMLVX and GMSMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMLVX | GMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.50% | -70.55% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.40% | -13.52% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.37% | -28.90% | -6.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.40% | -41.31% | +1.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.73% | -6.35% | -5.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.28% | -14.93% | -3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 3.55% | -0.07% |
Volatility
GMLVX vs. GMSMX - Volatility Comparison
GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund (GMSMX) at 6.88%. This indicates that GMLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMLVX | GMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.86% | 6.88% | +2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.99% | 12.67% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.17% | 21.60% | -3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 20.85% | -4.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 21.70% | -4.33% |