GMLGX vs. GPTUX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GMLGX (GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund) and GPTUX (GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - GMLGX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by GuideMark, while GPTUX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by GuideMark. Over the past 10 years, GMLGX returned 13.68%/yr vs 9.29%/yr for GPTUX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GMLGX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for GPTUX.

Performance

GMLGX vs. GPTUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX) and GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMLGX achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly lower than GPTUX's 7.41% return. Over the past 10 years, GMLGX has outperformed GPTUX with an annualized return of 13.68%, while GPTUX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.29% annualized return.

GMLGX

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 6.82%
• 6M: 5.76%
• 1Y: 22.36%
• 3Y*: 18.32%
• 5Y*: 11.33%
• 10Y*: 13.68%

GPTUX

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 7.41%
• 6M: 6.50%
• 1Y: 19.03%
• 3Y*: 14.26%
• 5Y*: 10.80%
• 10Y*: 9.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMLGX vs. GPTUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GMLGX GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund	6.82%	14.26%	22.35%	25.27%	-19.10%	26.33%	22.21%	28.12%	-5.53%	20.65%
GPTUX GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund	7.41%	7.08%	20.29%	14.85%	-6.15%	19.72%	-3.42%	20.50%	-4.54%	18.93%

Correlation

The correlation between GMLGX and GPTUX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012	0.92

The correlation between GMLGX and GPTUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GMLGX vs. GPTUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMLGX

GMLGX Risk / Return Rank: 43
GMLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
GMLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
GMLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
GMLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GMLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

GPTUX

GPTUX Risk / Return Rank: 35
GPTUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GPTUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
GPTUX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
GPTUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GPTUX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMLGX vs. GPTUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX) and GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GMLGX	GPTUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.50	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	2.11	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.26	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	2.33	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.82	8.84	+0.98

GMLGX vs. GPTUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMLGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the GPTUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMLGX and GPTUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GMLGX vs. GPTUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMLGX drawdown since its inception was -56.56%, which is greater than GPTUX's maximum drawdown of -22.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMLGX and GPTUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMLGX	GPTUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.56%	-22.84%	-33.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.59%	-8.31%	-1.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.36%	-16.31%	-4.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.54%	-16.31%	-9.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.15%	-22.84%	-12.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-0.42%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-4.31%	-5.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	2.19%	+0.07%

Volatility

GMLGX vs. GPTUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX) is 3.98%, while GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that GMLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPTUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMLGX	GPTUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.98%	5.18%	-1.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.52%	10.22%	-0.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.44%	12.94%	-0.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.69%	13.09%	+4.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.69%	12.97%	+5.72%

GMLGX vs. GPTUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMLGX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GPTUX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMLGX vs. GPTUX - Dividend Comparison

GMLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.31%, more than GPTUX's 7.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GMLGX GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund	17.31%	18.49%	4.20%	0.75%	10.27%	3.03%	0.38%	1.01%	2.22%	4.25%	2.99%	3.08%
GPTUX GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund	7.79%	8.37%	6.41%	1.24%	4.81%	10.27%	4.82%	4.34%	4.68%	3.43%	1.05%	1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMLGX and GPTUX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, GMLGX and GPTUX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GMLGX or GPTUX?

GPTUX has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to GMLGX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMLGX dropped -56.56% vs GPTUX's -22.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.