GMLGX vs. GMSMX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX) and GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund (GMSMX).
GMLGX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Jun 29, 2001. GMSMX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Jun 29, 2001.
Performance
GMLGX vs. GMSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMLGX vs. GMSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMLGX GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund | -4.99% | 14.26% | 22.35% | 25.27% | -19.10% | 26.33% | 22.21% | 28.12% | -5.53% | 20.65% |
GMSMX GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund | 0.00% | 8.76% | 11.29% | 17.73% | -18.23% | 24.45% | 21.98% | 23.25% | -9.38% | 14.46% |
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, GMLGX has outperformed GMSMX with an annualized return of 12.32%, while GMSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.22% annualized return.
GMLGX
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- -4.45%
- YTD
- -4.99%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- 1Y
- 14.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
GMSMX
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 17.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- 4.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMLGX vs. GMSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMLGX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than GMSMX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GMLGX vs. GMSMX — Risk / Return Rank
GMLGX
GMSMX
GMLGX vs. GMSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX) and GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund (GMSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMLGX | GMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.53 | 5.06 | +0.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMLGX | GMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.22 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.47 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.27 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMLGX and GMSMX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GMLGX vs. GMSMX - Dividend Comparison
GMLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.46%, more than GMSMX's 6.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMLGX GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund | 19.46% | 18.49% | 4.20% | 0.75% | 10.27% | 3.03% | 0.38% | 1.01% | 2.22% | 4.25% | 2.99% | 3.08% |
GMSMX GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund | 6.91% | 6.91% | 9.08% | 0.67% | 2.29% | 11.71% | 2.06% | 1.43% | 6.72% | 34.90% | 0.28% | 2.83% |
Drawdowns
GMLGX vs. GMSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMLGX drawdown since its inception was -56.56%, smaller than the maximum GMSMX drawdown of -70.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMLGX and GMSMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMLGX | GMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.56% | -70.55% | +13.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.82% | -13.52% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.54% | -28.90% | +3.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.15% | -41.31% | +6.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.90% | -6.35% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.51% | -14.93% | +5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 3.55% | -0.68% |
Volatility
GMLGX vs. GMSMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX) is 5.19%, while GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund (GMSMX) has a volatility of 6.88%. This indicates that GMLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMLGX | GMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 6.88% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 12.67% | -3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.73% | 21.60% | -2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 20.85% | -3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 21.70% | -3.04% |