GOVT vs. IWF
GOVT (iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF) and IWF (iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOVT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Core Bond Index, while IWF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GOVT returned 0.84%/yr vs 18.17%/yr for IWF. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. GOVT charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IWF.
Performance
GOVT vs. IWF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOVT achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than IWF's 2.87% return. Over the past 10 years, GOVT has underperformed IWF with an annualized return of 0.84%, while IWF has yielded a comparatively higher 18.17% annualized return.
GOVT
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 3.10%
- 5Y*
- -0.50%
- 10Y*
- 0.84%
IWF
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 3.39%
- 1Y
- 20.40%
- 3Y*
- 22.33%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.17%
GOVT vs. IWF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOVT iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | 0.11% | 3.77% | 2.95% | 4.17% | -13.39% | -1.11% | 7.28% | 7.36% | 0.26% | 2.19% |
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 2.87% | 18.33% | 33.12% | 42.59% | -29.31% | 27.43% | 38.25% | 35.86% | -1.67% | 29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOVT and IWF is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012 | -0.13 |
The correlation between GOVT and IWF shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOVT vs. IWF — Risk / Return Rank
GOVT
IWF
GOVT vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (GOVT) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOVT | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.21 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.16 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.27 | 3.83 | -0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOVT vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOVT drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, smaller than the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOVT and IWF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOVT | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.07% | -64.25% | +45.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.85% | -16.27% | +13.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.43% | -23.36% | +17.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.60% | -32.72% | +16.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.07% | -32.72% | +13.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.97% | -5.56% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -22.06% | +16.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 4.93% | -3.91% |
Volatility
GOVT vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (GOVT) is 1.15%, while iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that GOVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOVT | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 5.36% | -4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.58% | 12.40% | -9.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.59% | 15.95% | -12.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.04% | 21.46% | -15.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.23% | 21.00% | -15.77% |
GOVT vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOVT has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IWF's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GOVT vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison
GOVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than IWF's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOVT iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | 3.58% | 3.49% | 3.14% | 2.65% | 1.77% | 0.96% | 2.17% | 1.98% | 1.97% | 1.57% | 1.40% | 1.25% |
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 0.49% | 0.66% | 0.99% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOVT and IWF have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWF has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to GOVT (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOVT dropped -19.07% vs IWF's -64.25%.
On 10-year performance, IWF leads with 18.17% vs 0.84% for GOVT. On fees, GOVT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, GOVT has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWF has performed better with a 18.17% return vs 0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GOVT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IWF.
GOVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.35% for IWF.
GOVT is categorized as Government Bonds, while IWF is Large Cap Growth Equities. GOVT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Core Bond Index, while IWF tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for GOVT and 0.18% for IWF.
IWF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOVT and IWF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer