PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOW vs. MAGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOW vs. MAGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOW achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than MAGY's -0.35% return.


GOOW

1D
4.51%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
20.63%
6M
17.80%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGY

1D
1.17%
1M
2.43%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
0.01%
1Y
14.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOW vs. MAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GOOW and MAGY is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.60

GOOW vs. MAGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GOOW
MAGY

Communication Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

99.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

GOOW
100.0%
MAGY

-

Basic Materials

GOOW

-

MAGY

-

Consumer Cyclical

GOOW

-

MAGY

-

Consumer Defensive

GOOW

-

MAGY

-

Energy

GOOW

-

MAGY

-

Financial Services

GOOW

-

MAGY
99.9%

Healthcare

GOOW

-

MAGY

-

Industrials

GOOW

-

MAGY

-

Real Estate

GOOW

-

MAGY

-

Technology

GOOW

-

MAGY

-

Utilities

GOOW

-

MAGY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOW vs. MAGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOW

MAGY
MAGY Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOW vs. MAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GOOW vs. MAGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOOWMAGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.71

1.61

+2.10

Drawdowns

GOOW vs. MAGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOW drawdown since its inception was -24.88%, which is greater than MAGY's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOW and MAGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOWMAGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.88%

-14.29%

-10.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.28%

-2.51%

-6.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-2.69%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

Volatility

GOOW vs. MAGY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOWMAGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.56%

14.41%

+23.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.56%

14.58%

+22.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.56%

14.58%

+22.98%

GOOW vs. MAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GOOW and MAGY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

GOOW vs. MAGY - Dividend Comparison

GOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.69%, less than MAGY's 36.92% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GOOW and MAGY have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GOOW and MAGY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 36.92%, compared with 33.69% for GOOW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOW and MAGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer