GOOW vs. IPDP
GOOW (Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. GOOW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.
Performance
GOOW vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GOOW
- 1D
- 4.51%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 17.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPDP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOW vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF | 16.39% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
GOOW vs. IPDP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GOOW
IPDP
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
GOOW
IPDP
-
Basic Materials
GOOW
-
IPDP
Consumer Cyclical
GOOW
-
IPDP
Consumer Defensive
GOOW
-
IPDP
Energy
GOOW
-
IPDP
-
Financial Services
GOOW
-
IPDP
Healthcare
GOOW
-
IPDP
Industrials
GOOW
-
IPDP
Real Estate
GOOW
-
IPDP
-
Technology
GOOW
-
IPDP
Utilities
GOOW
-
IPDP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOW vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOOW | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.71 | — | — |
Drawdowns
GOOW vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOW drawdown since its inception was -24.88%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOW and IPDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOW | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.88% | 0.00% | -24.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.28% | 0.00% | -9.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | 0.00% | -4.82% |
Volatility
GOOW vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOW | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.56% | 0.00% | +37.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.56% | 0.00% | +37.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.56% | 0.00% | +37.56% |
GOOW vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOOW vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison
GOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.69%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF | 33.69% | 19.77% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, GOOW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GOOW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.
GOOW has the higher dividend yield at 33.69%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOOW and 1.52% for IPDP.
Find the right allocation for GOOW and IPDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer