GOODN vs. CROX
GOODN (Gladstone Commercial Corporation) and CROX (Crocs, Inc.) are both stocks. GOODN operates in REIT - Diversified (Real Estate), while CROX operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, GOODN returned 4.14%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for CROX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GOODN vs. CROX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOODN achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly lower than CROX's 39.01% return.
GOODN
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- —
CROX
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 39.01%
- 6M
- 31.20%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 4.29%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- 27.87%
GOODN vs. CROX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOODN Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 1.15% | 9.52% | 17.88% | -1.72% | -6.87% | 10.15% | 3.40% | 5.93% |
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 39.01% | -21.92% | 17.26% | -13.85% | -15.43% | 104.63% | 49.58% | 49.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOODN and CROX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
GOODN:
$0.60
CROX:
-$1.94
GOODN:
4.76
CROX:
1.58
GOODN:
$165.74M
CROX:
$4.02B
GOODN:
-$19.45M
CROX:
$2.34B
GOODN:
$45.52M
CROX:
$297.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOODN vs. CROX — Risk / Return Rank
GOODN
CROX
GOODN vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOODN) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOODN | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.13 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 0.63 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | 1.07 | +0.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOODN vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOODN drawdown since its inception was -56.43%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOODN and CROX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOODN | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.43% | -98.74% | +42.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -32.54% | +24.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.63% | -54.04% | +41.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.74% | -73.86% | +41.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -34.16% | +32.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -61.24% | +53.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 19.15% | -15.25% |
Volatility
GOODN vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOODN) is 3.37%, while Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a volatility of 10.40%. This indicates that GOODN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOODN | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 10.40% | -7.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.70% | 32.58% | -24.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 52.46% | -39.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 55.17% | -36.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.83% | 55.99% | -25.16% |
Dividends
GOODN vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison
GOODN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, while CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOODN Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 7.39% | 7.20% | 7.33% | 8.04% | 7.27% | 6.32% | 6.54% | 1.53% |
Financials
GOODN vs. CROX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Commercial Corporation and Crocs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GOODN vs. CROX - Profitability Comparison
GOODN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 41.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CROX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 522.95M and revenue of 921.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.8%.
GOODN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 41.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CROX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 200.84M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
GOODN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a net income of 6.97M and revenue of 41.91M, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.
CROX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 137.56M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOODN and CROX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CROX has higher volatility (10.40%) compared to GOODN (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOODN dropped -56.43% vs CROX's -98.74%.
CROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOODN and CROX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer